Thread: Status of p-1.... View Single Post
 2005-03-04, 05:51 #21 dave_0273     Oct 2003 Australia, Brisbane 2×5×47 Posts I must appologise for my absence from the forum of late, i have been working on other things. Yes, for those that are wondering, there are other things than working on GIMPS... although not widely known about. Status of p-1 using the 24th February status files Code:  M NUMBER 0-13 0 13 0 14 0 15 167 16 2 17 84 18 455 19 1494 20 1108 21 525 22 308 23 290 24 256 25 141 26 94 27 27 28 0 29 3 30 0 I have changed the format slightly. There haven't been any p-1s that needed to be done up to 13M for months now so I have made that one big range for easier reading (as if it got any bigger you would have to start using the scroll within the code - and that is just messy). I have also included everything up to 30M now. Although we haven't got up to that range on primenet (with the exception of the +10mil digits) but it will be interesting to see how it grows. To see if how people actually do the the p-1 and how many skip it. Code: 0.1MRANGE NUMBER CHANGE 15.0 100 0 15.1 0 0 15.2 0 0 15.3 0 0 15.4 0 0 15.5 0 0 15.6 0 0 15.7 0 0 15.8 0 0 15.9 67 0 16.0 0 0 16.1 0 0 16.2 0 0 16.3 0 0 16.4 0 0 16.5 0 0 16.6 0 0 16.7 0 0 16.8 0 0 16.9 2 +1 17.0 0 0 17.1 0 0 17.2 0 0 17.3 0 0 17.4 0 0 17.5 0 0 17.6 83 0 17.7 0 0 17.8 0 0 17.9 1 0 18.0 0 -108 18.1 0 -126 18.2 0 -100 18.3 0 -113 18.4 0 -123 18.5 0 -120 18.6 54 -56 18.7 102 0 18.8 180 0 18.9 119 0 19.0 127 ? 19.1 113 ? 19.2 136 ? 19.3 148 ? 19.4 133 ? 19.5 138 ? 19.6 153 ? 19.7 235 ? 19.8 130 ? 19.9 181 ? I have now included a "breakdown" view up to 20million as I have now all work below 20million is now available for claiming in the forum. It is also good to see that we are developing quite a lead on the leading edge of double checking. Everything up to 15mil is now on primenet. Those 167 exponents in the 15mil range are being worked on, just incase anyone was wondering what was happenning with them. Also, just incase anyone was wondering, sometimes the numbers of exponents that need to be p-1ed in the list above might be greater than the number in the corresponding block that I have posted in the forums. This is because I don't assign any exponent that it currently being worked on that was assigned through primenet (ie is currently in status.txt). Last fiddled with by dave_0273 on 2005-03-04 at 05:52