View Single Post
Old 2012-02-11, 20:53   #6
debrouxl
 
debrouxl's Avatar
 
Sep 2009

977 Posts
Default

Well, if the performance penalty of using this (currently hypothetical) fat GMP-ECM binary is really 5%, compared to the performance of a CPU family-specific binary, large scale ECM users (bdodson et al.) are unlikely to use a fat binary, aren't they ?

Should the task of a fat GMP-ECM binary be undertaken, I guess that all of us could happily contribute CPU power to further tuning (if necessary, of course), on various CPU families
debrouxl is offline   Reply With Quote