View Single Post
Old 2014-08-03, 00:22   #9
CRGreathouse
 
CRGreathouse's Avatar
 
Aug 2006

134468 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
9 factors, after all.


So that's definitely unusual clustering on the one algebraic factor. Does anyone know why? I see that 44971818273701332261784061961 * 9664021418404865297256058765601 * 386265978137298005895635792872544753829637 is close to a quarter of the logarithmic total, but not close enough that I could reasonably expect something nice like the original factorization.

Last fiddled with by CRGreathouse on 2014-08-03 at 00:37
CRGreathouse is offline   Reply With Quote