View Single Post
Old 2011-12-12, 22:52   #2
bsquared
 
bsquared's Avatar
 
"Ben"
Feb 2007

2·17·97 Posts
Default

If the relations were "no good" then you would have either had skads of error message during filtering or perhaps much higher than usual duplicate relations (30% or more, say). If you saw neither of these situations, then the relations were probably fine and the 113% is just due to do a low initial guess or something.

As long as you are doing things manually on linux anyway, that doesn't sound any easier than just working directly with gnfs-lasieve*. Although I suppose it avoids figuring out starting Q and min rels figures.
bsquared is offline   Reply With Quote