Thread: 7+ table
View Single Post
Old 2005-11-11, 17:59   #5
philmoore
 
philmoore's Avatar
 
"Phil"
Sep 2002
Tracktown, U.S.A.

45F16 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman
Bruce suggested that in another year, running ECM on the current Cunningham numbers will not longer be worthwhile. I would like to see
ECM run to at least level 1.0 at p50 before succumbing to this point of view.
This seems surprising, as I would expect that there are quite a few Cunningham numbers on which one would want to do ECM factoring to the 55 or 60 digit level before proceeding with SNFS.
philmoore is offline