View Single Post
Old 2020-10-21, 16:32   #43
storm5510
Random Account
 
storm5510's Avatar
 
Aug 2009
U.S.A.

1,811 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by LaurV View Post
For fun, I just timed factor5 (the old version from 2009, I don't have newer) and it is about few thousand times faster compared with the script (slow laptop, 6 threads in 2 cores to feed the cpu 100%, P95 running in background, i.e. doing nothing due to priority limit, computer still normally responsive).
I believe M1277 has been factored to 2^67. I have both the old and the new factor5 here somewhere. The new doesn't know from 2^? It uses k only. Somewhere in my notebook I keep, there is a conversion formula I scratched down a long time ago. Someone here presented the formula. Who or when, I cannot remember.

After doing a little searching in my notes, I believe I found it. It looks like so: k = 2x / 2p. The x would be replaced with 67 then 68. 2p is 2*1277. If this is correct, the lower k would be 57,781,500,622,426,160, and the upper is 115,563,001,244,852,320. I do not believe it multi-threads, so it could take decades, if not centuries, to run.

I found the archive. It is attached below if anyone wants to mess with it. It produces a results file, but no interim screen output. Luigi Morelli wrote this in 2018. I believe many here know who Luigi is.
Attached Files
File Type: zip factor5j.zip (1.17 MB, 18 views)
storm5510 is offline   Reply With Quote