View Single Post
Old 2010-04-07, 17:59   #11
Mini-Geek
Account Deleted
 
Mini-Geek's Avatar
 
"Tim Sorbera"
Aug 2006
San Antonio, TX USA

426710 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
I'll take k=349 and k=353 from 1M to 1.5M.

Edit: Files sent
Files received and work has begun. I don't really want to calculate an ETA, (might give me second thoughts about this ) but for the most part it will have the full attention of my quad, and I'll report on it periodically.
By a remarkable coincidence, there are exactly as many candidates for each k in the range I reserved! Each has 14561 candidates in n=1M-1.5M. I originally (for n=600K+) picked them because they had similar weights, but this is still a very odd coincidence. (over 1M-2M, 353 has 120 more candidates than 349, which is actually opposite from what you'd expect from their Nash weights: 349's 1463 vs 353's 1416)

Last fiddled with by Mini-Geek on 2010-04-07 at 17:59
Mini-Geek is offline   Reply With Quote