View Single Post
Old 2009-04-23, 00:19   #30
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

236238 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MyDogBuster View Post
Clusters are hard to predict but just because you guys are doing it manually
doesn't mean it can't happen. There are 92 k's in this run. The port 8000 run has 500k's, so you they had a better chance for a nice run, but I've seen stranger things happen. I've had manual files about this size where I found 3 or 4 primes in it. Ya just never know.
To be a nit pick: It's actually 93 k's in this run -and- port 8000 has 300 k's.

As for the run on port 8000 this morning: I believe that was the single greatest run we've ever had within such a small n-range for such large tests. The new folks got to see a gem!
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote