Thread: Testing....
View Single Post
Old 2010-03-15, 00:27   #258
A Sunny Moo
mdettweiler's Avatar
Aug 2007

141518 Posts

Originally Posted by gd_barnes View Post
So I guess the above was not clear enough about port 6000, huh?

Doing the README would have taken 10-15 mins. Are you telling me that the results would have taken less? I think not. The README was asked for 3 different times. How could it keep getting forgotten?

Priorities please!

So I've now lost an hour out of my business trip. I've now loaded up port 6000 and updated the drive, which took way longer than it should have because of the terrible remote access that I now have. That's why I asked you to do it.

Karsten is busier than either of us. Maybe we need to give him remote access to my machines to load up servers. You know, if you need something done, give it to a busy person. It will get done!

Attached is the updated Linux README. Karsten, can you review the 1st line of the 1st para. and the updated para. about your patches to the Windows binary values. I made sure to note that the any Linux changes would be "similar" but not necessarily the same as the example that Max originally put in there. After doing the review, can you update it in your Linux client link? That's what I've been hoping for all along.

I don't have any more time to review the Windows documentation. I'll do that late Tuesday. Max, you don't need that on your plate. In the future, if I need something non-technical done, I'll just do it myself. It's far easier. I've spent 30 mins. in reminders and explanations about what we needed on the README and it only took me 10 mins. to change it. That's a no-brainer.

Ah, that would explain it...I believe I semi-skimmed that post (very bad habit ) and thought "oh, Monday, that's a ways off". DUH.

The readme looks good. I'll upload it right now...yes, really, right now. lol Edit: done

Last fiddled with by mdettweiler on 2010-03-15 at 00:38
mdettweiler is offline   Reply With Quote