View Single Post
Old 2017-12-27, 20:06   #21
gophne
 
Feb 2017

3·5·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Batalov View Post
Ok, if you insist. You are crazy, dude.
"You tested all primes" to M34. ...oh... oh... allrighty then.
Hi Batalov

Your point about testing all primes to M34...of course being humongous number, let alone the possible "missing" large primes...but this statement relates to the logic of the algorithm. You don't have to count to infinity to know that x+1 follows x at any point of the set of let us say "integers".

I really value you input, as I would consider any other approach to be naive to a large degree with respect to the claims being made.
gophne is offline   Reply With Quote