Thread
:
mfaktc: Mis-reported composite factor
View Single Post
2016-02-05, 19:41
#
2
TheJudger
"Oliver"
Mar 2005
Germany
10001010110
2
Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by
mattmill30
Why would mfaktc choose 95bit_mul32_gs over barrett87_mul32_gs for factoring T77-81?
Because you set "Stages=0". The barett92/88/87 family can only do a single bitlevel at once.
TheJudger
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by TheJudger