Quote:
Originally Posted by Jens K Andersen
How fortunate I already understood the proof. Otherwise I would be very confused now.
The 3 zip files are Word documents. The last 2 are diagrams. A quote from the 1st:
"Euclid (and most other mathematicians) have assumed that 2 and 3 are primes.
But I claim, that 2 and 3 are not possible primes and should not be considered as
“primes”."
In the words of Paul: Humpty-Dumpty alert!
|
You have better read the original publication, - and be more polite.
troels munkner