View Single Post
Old 2007-08-22, 12:17   #3
Andi47's Avatar
Oct 2004

2·17·73 Posts

Originally Posted by xilman View Post
Sounds like an excellent idea to us!

I agree. And it would be even better if the resulting number is checked if it's an integer:
A typo in one of the (long) factors which are to be divided out before ECMing, the parser cuts off the digits behind the decimal point after the division, and then I wonder why the number is divilible by things like 24*3*5²*17 (or even worse, if it is NOT divisible by such small stuff and the first "factor" is e.g. a p37 which looks quite ok, but in fact is nonsense....)

Last fiddled with by Andi47 on 2007-08-22 at 12:17
Andi47 is offline   Reply With Quote