View Single Post
Old 2019-04-15, 15:03   #27
wblipp
 
wblipp's Avatar
 
"William"
May 2003
New Haven

1001001101102 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
I will try to fix the proof once again ... Since no twin prime number divides 1, p can not be on the list.
Looking good to here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MathDoggy View Post
This means that at least one twin prime number exists beyond those in the list.
Ooops. This means at least one prime (p) exists beyond those in the list. But why must it be a twin prime?
wblipp is offline   Reply With Quote