View Single Post
Old 2020-04-24, 14:43   #9
rogue
 
rogue's Avatar
 
"Mark"
Apr 2003
Between here and the

22·33·5·11 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pepi37 View Post
Rogue as we write in PM, you must fix srsieve2 to go upper then 2^52 because this limit is low. What user have from the fact srsieve2 is faster then sr1sieve if upper limit is low (2^52)

Maybe you should fix this first
When not using Legendre tables, srsieve2 appears to be faster than sr2sieve for most sequences, Based upon testing I have done sr1sieve is much faster than srsieve2, but that is expected.

I agree that getting srsieve2 to support p > 2^52 is important. Although the code changes are not too difficult, if I want to maximize speed for p < 2^52 and p > 2^52 it becomes more of a challenge. At this time I might need to have two different builds. I would like to avoid that.

For now you will have to survive using sr2sieve for p > 2^52.

Last fiddled with by rogue on 2020-04-24 at 14:46
rogue is offline   Reply With Quote