View Single Post
 2014-05-19, 22:20 #10 fivemack (loop (#_fork))     Feb 2006 Cambridge, England 2·52·127 Posts Here, for a random C124 with Murphy score 1.77e-10, are some timings for different alim and different ranges. They're really not what I expected: I would have thought that sieving well beyond Q0 was a bad idea. Code: alim Q (with 28/12e) time rel uniq ideals matrix 2 2-7 101870.2275 11905078 10430364 14715990 fail 2-8 121324.1423 13759598 11864512 15749318 fail 2-9 140607.982 15538550 13213233 16632104 fail 2-10 159487.2929 17218204 14465025 17381742 fail 2-11 178047.7998 18849180 15663145 18044872 1051033 4 2-9 204011.4358 21658907 18547562 20149112 879637 2-8.5 189501.4654 20339028 17534519 19671448 975442 2-8 174845.7571 18978238 16478927 19137617 fail 3-9 177762.3 18430231 16338414 19131390 fail 6 3-9 216706.984 20554991 18272260 20173211 1018070 3-8.5 197834.5111 18989740 17003043 19563723 fail 8 3-8.5 220669.0495 19632466 17601209 19902924 1178651 3-8 198166.9867 17846588 too slow even if it worked Currently running similar sorts of things with lpbr=29 and with 13e to see how the numbers compare Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-05-19 at 22:27