View Single Post
Old 2014-05-19, 22:20   #10
fivemack
(loop (#_fork))
 
fivemack's Avatar
 
Feb 2006
Cambridge, England

2·52·127 Posts
Default

Here, for a random C124 with Murphy score 1.77e-10, are some timings for different alim and different ranges. They're really not what I expected: I would have thought that sieving well beyond Q0 was a bad idea.

Code:
alim	Q (with 28/12e)	time	rel		uniq		ideals		matrix
2	2-7	101870.2275	11905078	10430364	14715990	fail
	2-8	121324.1423	13759598	11864512	15749318	fail
	2-9	140607.982	15538550	13213233	16632104	fail
	2-10	159487.2929	17218204	14465025	17381742	fail
	2-11	178047.7998	18849180	15663145	18044872	1051033
4	2-9	204011.4358	21658907	18547562	20149112	879637
	2-8.5	189501.4654	20339028	17534519	19671448	975442
	2-8	174845.7571	18978238	16478927	19137617	fail
	3-9	177762.3	18430231	16338414	19131390	fail
6	3-9	216706.984	20554991	18272260	20173211	1018070
	3-8.5	197834.5111	18989740	17003043	19563723	fail
8	3-8.5	220669.0495	19632466	17601209	19902924	1178651
	3-8	198166.9867	17846588	too slow even if it worked
Currently running similar sorts of things with lpbr=29 and with 13e to see how the numbers compare

Last fiddled with by fivemack on 2014-05-19 at 22:27
fivemack is offline   Reply With Quote