View Single Post
Old 2014-05-16, 13:07   #4
henryzz
Just call me Henry
 
henryzz's Avatar
 
"David"
Sep 2007
Cambridge (GMT)

10110001100012 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fivemack View Post
It looks as if 28-29 is at about C148, 29-30 is at about C153, and 30-31 at about C158. But it's a reasonably subtle effect and there's about 10% noise in my measurements simply from sometimes sieving a bit too far. Here are some high tide marks
Extrapolating from those numbers C163 31-32 and C168 32-33. Does this mean when we do a 180+ digit number our large prime bounds are much too small?
henryzz is offline   Reply With Quote