View Single Post
Old 2015-10-13, 16:08   #23
alpertron
 
alpertron's Avatar
 
Aug 2002
Buenos Aires, Argentina

2×3×241 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
This does not adequately describe the procedure. You have added 2, then 4, then 6.
"Do this 30 times" can be taken to mean, "add 2 then 4 then 6" 30 times. The
meaning of the word "this" in your last sentence is not well defined.
So if you see in a passtime magazine the sentence fill in the blanks: 2, 4, 6, xx, xx, xx you would not write 8, 10, 12? Come on Bob.
This was intended for the OP, not for you.

Quote:
Sigh. You are completely missing the point. I am not asking the OP to
supply missing reasoning. I am asking him/her to explain why merely posting
a sequence of numbers without any given reasoning might constitute a proof.
With the sequence of 30 prime numbers, I asked the OP if all the terms in the infinite sequence are prime or not without calculator. Only reasoning. I have to repeat that the OP believes that the original sequence produces always prime numbers, but he is asking a proof from other people. That's why I presented this simple exercise.

Last fiddled with by alpertron on 2015-10-13 at 16:20
alpertron is offline   Reply With Quote