Quote:
Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman
He suggested that a sequence of numbers constituted a proof.
It is hard to correct someone's misconceptions without knowing how and
why they believe what they believe. A simple statement that what was
posted is not a proof says very little./// We need to know why the OP thought
that simply presenting a sequence of numbers might be a proof.

one thought I had is that they might think that because you can infinitely add to the representation that it represents and infinite amount of numbers and might intersect the primes infinitely often.