View Single Post
Old 2015-10-13, 14:24   #9
science_man_88's Avatar
"Forget I exist"
Jul 2009

26×131 Posts

Originally Posted by R.D. Silverman View Post
He suggested that a sequence of numbers constituted a proof.
It is hard to correct someone's misconceptions without knowing how and
why they believe what they believe. A simple statement that what was
posted is not a proof says very little./// We need to know why the OP thought
that simply presenting a sequence of numbers might be a proof.
one thought I had is that they might think that because you can infinitely add to the representation that it represents and infinite amount of numbers and might intersect the primes infinitely often.
science_man_88 is offline   Reply With Quote