View Single Post
Old 2004-08-12, 23:15   #2
nfortino
 
nfortino's Avatar
 
Nov 2003

2458 Posts
Default

The status as of 2004-Aug-12 22:00 UTC:

Of the 49 (out of 1144) exponents released for a 3rd test
(because both original tests were error-prone),
5 are still pending,
1 has a quadruple check on primenet,
1 needs a quintuple check,
3 need a quadruple check,
1 has apparently expired and not been reassigned,
7 have three matching results,
31 have two good results and one bad result.

Of the 785 (out of 1144) exponents which had been released for a second test,
61 are still pending,
8 have been factored,
3 have apparently expired and not been reassigned,
6 have very recently cleared,
612 have been confirmed good,
and the remaining 95 have erroneous results.
Of these 95,
10 have two good results and one bad result,
7 have a triple check on primenet,
1 needs a quadruple check,
77 still require a triple check.

This is an error rate of 95/(95+612)=.134,
far below the 0.333 error rate which was the criterion for detecting
error prone machines.

Finally, of the 310 (out of 1144) exponents released for a second check due to
harmfull error codes,
49 are still pending,
0 have been factored,
3 have recently cleared,
64 are now confirmed good,
the remaining 194 have erroneous results.
Of the 194,
3 have two good results and one bad result,
5 have a triple check on primenet,
1 needs a quintuple check,
5 need a quadruple check,
180 need a triple check.

This is an error rate of 194/(194+64)=.752

More detail in the attached file:
Attached Files
File Type: zip November_batch_status_081204.zip (42.7 KB, 205 views)
nfortino is offline   Reply With Quote