Thread: refused result
View Single Post
Old 2014-05-02, 03:42   #13
gd_barnes
 
gd_barnes's Avatar
 
May 2007
Kansas; USA

3×7×13×37 Posts
Default

My inclination at this point is to change one of the LLRnet servers to PRPnet so that we have 3 PRPnet servers and 1 LLRnet server. I'll see what current PRPnet servers I have available. I don't want to create a new one.

Ian, I'm thinking that we can stop the 8k mini-drive on LLRnet port 7000 at n=1.575M and start processing it on a PRPnet server. After that is done to n=2M (which will be a while), then we could change the 17k maxi-drive on LLRnet port 3500 over to the same PRPnet server. Are you OK with this? That would ultimately phase out LLRnet.

Last fiddled with by gd_barnes on 2014-05-02 at 03:43
gd_barnes is offline   Reply With Quote