View Single Post
Old 2011-02-03, 21:04   #46
mart_r
 
mart_r's Avatar
 
Dec 2008
you know...around...

51510 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mini-Geek View Post
I was not aware of these twin primes. Is the pair listed on a list anywhere, or did you just find the pair, or what? A google search can't find it, and it's not large enough to be on any list I can see. I can confirm with PFGW that they are primes. (the number between the primes is easily trial factored to at least 33.34%)
Hehe, I wondered if I should tell where I "found" it, but I was interested in whether you'd find out by yourself...
It's from the largest known prime triplet that doesn't contain a ±1 twin, found in March 2006 by Ken Davis.
mart_r is offline   Reply With Quote