mersenneforum.org - View Single Post - Poly select and test-sieving for RSA232

orever · 2020-01-07, 00:09

Thanks for the answer.

The complementary data:

POLY:

Code:

skew: 3280536.395  
 c0: -2963521726450804168545574989181604944974055470262264097100  
 c1: -8152690578728840862728149245184473131571416030581953  
 c2: 4530419292332128770249146516543999988943765890  
 c3: 87634441208849856388603554546291847879  
 c4: -844120661985043880048339652132070  
 c5: 13409199100611061897507722  
 c6: -59711977080  
 Y0: -108073099124290591101496444923166525774281367655542  
 Y1: 2355770915946536318263  
 # MurphyE (Bf=1.43e+09,Bg=7.00e+08,area=3.07e+18) = 4.29e-16  
 # f(x) =  -59711977080*x^6+13409199100611061897507722*x^5-844120661985043880048339652132070*x^4+87634441208849856388603554546291847879*x^3+4530419292332128770249146516543999988943765890*x^2-8152690578728840862728149245184473131571416030581953*x-2963521726450804168545574989181604944974055470262264097100  
 # g(x) = 2355770915946536318263*x-108073099124290591101496444923166525774281367655542

Param:

lim0 = 700000000
lim1 = 1430000000
lpb0 = 35
lpb1 = 36
maxfailed = 5000
name = c310
tasks.I = 16
tasks.maxtimedout = 3000
tasks.qmin = 1073741823
tasks.threads = 2
tasks.wutimeout = 24000
tasks.filter.maxlevel = 40
tasks.filter.target_density = 170.0
tasks.filter.purge.keep = 160
tasks.linalg.m = 64
tasks.linalg.n = 64
tasks.linalg.bwc.interleaving = 0
tasks.linalg.bwc.interval = 1000
tasks.linalg.characters.nchar = 50
tasks.polyselect.P = 10000000
tasks.polyselect.admax = 1e6
tasks.polyselect.adrange = 1000
tasks.polyselect.degree = 6
tasks.polyselect.incr = 60
tasks.polyselect.nq = 1296
tasks.polyselect.nrkeep = 100
tasks.polyselect.threads = 2
tasks.sieve.mfb0 = 70
tasks.sieve.mfb1 = 105
tasks.sieve.ncurves0 = 30
tasks.sieve.ncurves1 = 30
tasks.sieve.qrange = 1000
tasks.sieve.las.threads = 4

I read on params.c240 in git:

tasks.polyselect.P = 20000000
tasks.polyselect.admax = 2e12
tasks.polyselect.adrange = 10000000
tasks.polyselect.incr = 110880
tasks.polyselect.nq = 1296 # this is 6^4
tasks.polyselect.nrkeep = 100
tasks.wutimeout = 7200
tasks.polyselect.sopteffort = 20
tasks.polyselect.ropteffort = 10

Read and your post,

https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...81&postcount=6

"I bet they'd have better-yet performance with nq of 7776 and admax around 3e11"

Would these be better for a 1024 bits?

2020-01-07, 00:09	#25
orever Oct 2019 2₈ Posts	Thanks for the answer. The complementary data: POLY: Code: skew: 3280536.395 c0: -2963521726450804168545574989181604944974055470262264097100 c1: -8152690578728840862728149245184473131571416030581953 c2: 4530419292332128770249146516543999988943765890 c3: 87634441208849856388603554546291847879 c4: -844120661985043880048339652132070 c5: 13409199100611061897507722 c6: -59711977080 Y0: -108073099124290591101496444923166525774281367655542 Y1: 2355770915946536318263 # MurphyE (Bf=1.43e+09,Bg=7.00e+08,area=3.07e+18) = 4.29e-16 # f(x) = -59711977080x^6+13409199100611061897507722x^5-844120661985043880048339652132070x^4+87634441208849856388603554546291847879x^3+4530419292332128770249146516543999988943765890x^2-8152690578728840862728149245184473131571416030581953x-2963521726450804168545574989181604944974055470262264097100 # g(x) = 2355770915946536318263x-108073099124290591101496444923166525774281367655542 Param: lim0 = 700000000 lim1 = 1430000000 lpb0 = 35 lpb1 = 36 maxfailed = 5000 name = c310 tasks.I = 16 tasks.maxtimedout = 3000 tasks.qmin = 1073741823 tasks.threads = 2 tasks.wutimeout = 24000 tasks.filter.maxlevel = 40 tasks.filter.target_density = 170.0 tasks.filter.purge.keep = 160 tasks.linalg.m = 64 tasks.linalg.n = 64 tasks.linalg.bwc.interleaving = 0 tasks.linalg.bwc.interval = 1000 tasks.linalg.characters.nchar = 50 tasks.polyselect.P = 10000000 tasks.polyselect.admax = 1e6 tasks.polyselect.adrange = 1000 tasks.polyselect.degree = 6 tasks.polyselect.incr = 60 tasks.polyselect.nq = 1296 tasks.polyselect.nrkeep = 100 tasks.polyselect.threads = 2 tasks.sieve.mfb0 = 70 tasks.sieve.mfb1 = 105 tasks.sieve.ncurves0 = 30 tasks.sieve.ncurves1 = 30 tasks.sieve.qrange = 1000 tasks.sieve.las.threads = 4 I read on params.c240 in git: tasks.polyselect.P = 20000000 tasks.polyselect.admax = 2e12 tasks.polyselect.adrange = 10000000 tasks.polyselect.incr = 110880 tasks.polyselect.nq = 1296 # this is 6^4 tasks.polyselect.nrkeep = 100 tasks.wutimeout = 7200 tasks.polyselect.sopteffort = 20 tasks.polyselect.ropteffort = 10 Read and your post, https://mersenneforum.org/showpost.p...81&postcount=6 "I bet they'd have better-yet performance with nq of 7776 and admax around 3e11" Would these be better for a 1024 bits? Last fiddled with by VBCurtis on 2020-01-07 at 01:43 Reason: added code tags*