View Single Post
Old 2004-07-29, 20:37   #2
ltd
 
ltd's Avatar
 
Apr 2003

11000001002 Posts
Default

I will do some tests with some of the psp numbers.( At first some low n)

My first observation was that it was slower then prp.exe

PRP.exe gave me 0.92mS per bit
PRP3.exe gives 1.234mS per bit for the same test.

Correction:
now it gives sometimes 0.573mS per bit.
The runtime is not stable: It moves between 0.57 and 1.2 mS. (most of the time >1.0mS)
The software runs on a P4 HT 3.0GHz with WinXP.
There is another DC project runing in parallel.(eulernet)
The same configurtion runs with prp.exe without changing times.

Lars

Last fiddled with by ltd on 2004-07-29 at 20:45
ltd is offline