Thread: Bad LL Tests
View Single Post
Old 2002-10-17, 17:54   #4
lycorn
 
lycorn's Avatar
 
Sep 2002
Oeiras, Portugal

138510 Posts
Default

I´ve also been browsing that file, and noticed several exponents with an error count of 00000000. How were they found to be bad?
Second point: George says all exponents in that file have been triple-checked, so why are they still in the list? Because 3 different results were returned , or the result kept in the list is the one found to be wrong? In that case the exponent should be also in the double-checked file, which I do not think is the case.
Third: I´ve done several double-checks over the last months, and I can find most of the exponents in the double-checked file. There are a few I can´t find, neither in that file nor in the bad file. And no, they are not the last ones I have tested... What could be the reason?
lycorn is offline   Reply With Quote