View Single Post
Old 2019-05-28, 23:39   #27
wfgarnett3
 
wfgarnett3's Avatar
 
"William Garnett III"
Oct 2002
Bensalem, PA

1268 Posts
Default

Attached is image2 which shows this home computer was indeed reporting a worse, incorrect probability for this first time PRP test of the exponent.

The worktodo.txt on this home computer is the below:

PRP=0A5CF58B6C3666AC9FE2A5E244054E24,1,2,85375753,-1

while when I log into mersenne.org it shows the worktodo text to copy as the below (which I used on my work laptop for image1):

PRP=0A5CF58B6C3666AC9FE2A5E244054E24,1,2,85375753,-1,76,0,3,

Is the "factored to 76 bit" missing in worktodo.txt the reason for the incorrect first time test probability?

If so, what is wrong with Prime95/PrimeNet, as Prime95 automatically got this assignment on its own but failed to put the factored 76 bit pieces into the PRP worktodo on its own like it used to when I used the previous version software for LL testing?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image2.png
Views:	73
Size:	11.6 KB
ID:	20479  

Last fiddled with by wfgarnett3 on 2019-05-28 at 23:40
wfgarnett3 is offline   Reply With Quote