View Single Post
Old 2005-07-29, 06:13   #5
em99010pepe
 
em99010pepe's Avatar
 
Sep 2004

2×5×283 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Citrix
If in 3T we just found 19 missed factors then I do not think it is worth double checking the dat ranges. May be we should just work on 20-50M and then join the dats around 85T. We are also likely to find duplicate factors for these numbers, so there is no need to find the smallest factor.

If we agree to this it would double are sieving speed.

Citrix
Correction. In 1T we found 19 missed factors.

Carlos
em99010pepe is offline   Reply With Quote