View Single Post
2019-05-28, 08:40   #91
Thomas11

Feb 2003

3×5×127 Posts

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Thomas11 So, presumably, the earlier searches (at least the references in OEIS A113274) ended below 9.0e14 and this gap (4807) should be hidden somewhere in Robert's ranges (e.g. below 8.5e14).
Just noticed that Firejuggler is actually testing from 9.0e15!

And the OEIS page contains a link to Tomás Oliveira e Silva's page:
http://sweet.ua.pt/tos/twin_gaps.html

He/they already tested the range up to 1e16 (in real numbers), which corresponds to 1.666e15 in our scale.

The largest gap found by e Silva is:
Code:
4807 466213802580250