Forum: PrimeNet
2007-04-03, 01:51
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 599
|
|
Forum: PrimeNet
2007-04-02, 14:06
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 599
|
|
Forum: PrimeNet
2007-04-02, 12:01
|
|
Replies: 3
Views: 599
Checking doublecheck results
I did a doublecheck to test suspicious virtual machine which gives errors with larger numbers (FFT size related maybe? not sure). Number was MM16944217 and I'd like the check the previous result and...
|
|
Forum: Hardware
2007-03-15, 20:56
|
|
Replies: 2
Views: 724
This might not fully answer your question, but...
This might not fully answer your question, but here's a comparison I did between my ex E6400(2MB cache) @3.2G and new E6600 @3.2G (4MB cache). E6600 falsely reported as 3.6GHz. Both were running same...
|
|
Forum: Software
2007-03-11, 05:56
|
|
Replies: 20
Views: 1,951
More E6600 results
If you need more, here's my E6600 un-OC'd.
Bus is running at 266MHz at 2:3 divider, 1066FSB (4-4-4-12). This is silly default. It could as well run 1:1 @ 400MHz if I "said so". But I guess vanilla...
|
|
Forum: Hardware
2007-03-10, 23:56
|
|
Replies: 849
Views: 169,418
E6600 OC'd to 3.2G
CPU falsely detected 3.6GHz by Prime95. CPU-Z gives the right 3.2GHz
E6600 L627B005 at 3200MHz (8x400)
G.Skill F2-6400CL4-1GBPK at 1:1 4-4-4-12
Asus P5B-Deluxe
WinXP-32
Core temps between...
|
