Forum: GPU to 72
2014-05-18, 11:17
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2014-04-23, 04:25
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
If I understood my friend correct there is a...
If I understood my friend correct there is a top-like display that records the accumulated number of errors locally on the miner. It is used for trimming the maximum amount of overclocking a GPU can...
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2014-04-23, 01:54
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2014-04-22, 23:31
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
Iffy GPU
I'm bringing up two second hand cards I just got my hands on, two Radeon 6950. One is running just fine but the other one have some random hardware errors and are failing circa 1% of the tests in the...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2014-04-18, 04:09
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2014-04-11, 01:42
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2014-04-04, 03:15
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: PrimeNet
2014-03-14, 10:46
|
|
Replies: 2,226
Views: 227,981
Same here, with the exception that when...
Same here, with the exception that when submitting the results file I got 0 counts on every result line. I'm keeping the results file and send it in later.
And in the page header I got these two...
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2014-01-30, 18:11
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
TheMawn, that probably explains it, I got the...
TheMawn, that probably explains it, I got the tail end of factors from someone that accidentally deleted a bunch of factors after a timeout during reporting.:bow:
The ten factors I found was from...
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2014-01-28, 21:50
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
What is the odds for ten consecutive...
What is the odds for ten consecutive factorisations? I had the pleasure of experience it once when running the smallest unreserved candidates in 87M... :fusion:
Manual testing 87159607 F...
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2013-12-15, 08:56
|
|
Replies: 221
Views: 16,959
You are making one logical mistake, you forget...
You are making one logical mistake, you forget about the lower ranges and growth of GIMPS.
Any one completing an assignment in a range below 50M needs a new assignment from the 60-69M range so you...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-11-23, 15:19
|
|
Replies: 294
Views: 27,316
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2013-11-01, 09:19
|
|
Replies: 143
Views: 16,656
On a similar note, I have two stuck assignments...
On a similar note, I have two stuck assignments that Spidey seems to be blind for.
http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=30970483
http://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=30970501...
|
Forum: GPU to 72
2013-09-21, 15:18
|
|
Replies: 5,187
Views: 345,003
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-07-07, 02:59
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-07-05, 23:47
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: Lone Mersenne Hunters
2013-06-14, 20:23
|
|
Replies: 1,901
Views: 242,072
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-06-04, 09:20
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
I found a small bugg.... :cool:
got...
I found a small bugg.... :cool:
got assignment: exp=33732341 bit_min=70 bit_max=71 (7.09 GHz-days)
Starting trial factoring M33732341 from 2^70 to 2^71 (7.09GHz-days)
Using GPU kernel...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-05-25, 20:41
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
How could you do that to me! Release a new...
How could you do that to me! Release a new wersion and calling it stable without letting me bash it for a while... :grin:
Anyhow, I have downloaded it and I ran the self test... look what i found!...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-05-13, 22:43
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
Great! There is nothing worse than a non...
Great! There is nothing worse than a non reproducible bug.
Just give me another beta and I'll break that one too! :boxer:
I just wish some moderator would add that description to my user,...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-05-10, 07:05
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-05-10, 06:58
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-04-27, 10:06
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-04-26, 20:43
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
Hmmmm... interesting
93.2% | 0m28s | ...
Hmmmm... interesting
93.2% | 0m28s | 48.74 | 0.429s | 37.75M | 87.99M/s | 1000 | 39.62%
93.3% | 0m31s | 42.67 | 0.490s | 37.75M | 77.04M/s | 1000 | 49.82%
93.4% | 0m31s...
|
Forum: GPU Computing
2013-04-18, 11:56
|
|
Replies: 1,676
Views: 231,028
|