Forum: Math
2021-04-15, 13:59
|
Replies: 10
Views: 4,832
|
Forum: Math
2021-04-13, 15:59
|
Replies: 10
Views: 4,832
|
Forum: Math
2021-04-13, 12:58
|
Replies: 4
Views: 169
|
Forum: Math
2021-04-12, 23:09
|
Replies: 4
Views: 169
|
Forum: Prime Gap Searches
2021-04-05, 13:51
|
Replies: 19
Views: 565
For that record used only your 1st method with...
For that record used only your 1st method with the following modification:
collect in array/vector those res values that occur maximal times as x%p and choose randomly(!) one res value from these....
|
Forum: Prime Gap Searches
2021-04-02, 23:22
|
Replies: 19
Views: 565
|
Forum: YAFU
2021-03-24, 22:48
|
Replies: 62
Views: 28,275
|
Forum: PrimeNet
2021-03-22, 23:06
|
Replies: 8
Views: 392
|
Forum: Hardware
2021-03-21, 17:00
|
Replies: 16
Views: 740
Checkout that p95 can change the blocksize, I...
Checkout that p95 can change the blocksize, I don't see any advantage to fix it.
Yes, that is true.
I have overlooked that as I can remember gpuowl is a little tricky in this area, because it...
|
Forum: Hardware
2021-03-21, 12:13
|
Replies: 16
Views: 740
Looks like my above formula is good, my...
Looks like my above formula is good, my reasoning:
we have q=(1-e)^B probability that in a single block all B iterations is good. You have 2*sqrt(B) iterations to do the in the check per block,
and...
|
Forum: Hardware
2021-03-19, 21:07
|
Replies: 16
Views: 740
|
Forum: Other Mathematical Topics
2021-03-11, 17:14
|
Replies: 27
Views: 823
It is a perfect counterexample to your claim in...
It is a perfect counterexample to your claim in the first post. Likely a=11 seems to be equally good just as a=3, maybe there is no other counterexample for a=11. Let me check [only the first few odd...
|
Forum: Other Mathematical Topics
2021-03-11, 16:16
|
Replies: 27
Views: 823
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-03-04, 18:03
|
Replies: 15
Views: 624
Destroyed?
rate=0.1;year=21;(1+rate)^year ...
Destroyed?
rate=0.1;year=21;(1+rate)^year
rate=0.03;year=3;(1-(1+rate)^(-year))/rate
answer:
%1 = 7.4002499442581601012110000000000000000
%2 = 2.8286113548946809221333416306177114687
|
Forum: Factoring
2021-03-03, 15:21
|
Replies: 13
Views: 2,415
An early slide from him:...
An early slide from him: https://eurocrypt2009rump.cr.yp.to/e074d37e10ad1ad227200ea7ba36cf73.pdf
Forums about these claims:...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-03-02, 20:32
|
Replies: 7
Views: 519
Very standard heuristic idea gives that we are...
Very standard heuristic idea gives that we are expecting very few [maybe zero] composites for G=nextprime(n!)-n! [if we exclude the G<2 cases].
As you noted to find composite G we need G>n^2 so...
|
Forum: Data
2021-02-24, 20:17
|
Replies: 558
Views: 84,108
We had already a Prp-cf test on this: ...
We had already a Prp-cf test on this:
https://www.mersenne.org/report_exponent/?exp_lo=82939&exp_hi=&full=1
Notice that for N=(k*2^n+c)/d we're using a Fermat test using
base^d as base, then...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-20, 09:53
|
Replies: 4
Views: 304
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-19, 20:18
|
Replies: 32
Views: 1,701
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-19, 15:18
|
Replies: 32
Views: 1,701
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-19, 10:36
|
Replies: 32
Views: 1,701
And with linear algebra would you need...
And with linear algebra would you need primepi(100)+eps=25+eps relations ?
OK, take my challenge factor my GRSA100 [G means Gerbicz], n=p*q number with 100 digits. You can use "your" method, and...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-19, 08:22
|
Replies: 32
Views: 1,701
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2021-02-19, 01:00
|
Replies: 32
Views: 1,701
|
Forum: Information & Answers
2021-02-15, 17:10
|
Replies: 26
Views: 7,003
Oh, yes that is even better what I've written,...
Oh, yes that is even better what I've written, and maybe: forcing that the server wouldn't give out the same prime exponent twice per day. In this way even if you have a fully factorized mp you would...
|
Forum: Information & Answers
2021-02-14, 23:39
|
Replies: 26
Views: 7,003
Interesting topic. Still don't see a way, my...
Interesting topic. Still don't see a way, my failed approach in the prp(!) setup:
The key idea is to change the base after a successful mining to a random base with say 64 bits.
And then the new...
|