mersenneforum.org  

Go Back   mersenneforum.org > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 25 of 174
Search took 0.03 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: xtreme2k
Forum: Software 2017-08-19, 06:23
Replies: 71
Views: 18,461
Posted By xtreme2k
It appears since 28.9 I can no longer merge all...

It appears since 28.9 I can no longer merge all workers to a single window. The option si grey out. Is this as intended?

With 28.7 I can but not 28.9, 28.10 and 29.2
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-27, 09:13
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
Madpoo On your post #667 and #668 you are...

Madpoo
On your post #667 and #668 you are indicating the 2690V4 is much faster than the 2697V3 however in all your other posts it is not the case? :confused2:

Is there a way to ensure 1w/14t run...
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-24, 12:09
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
Would you post the 1w/14t throughput please for...

Would you post the 1w/14t throughput please for the 2690V4?:bow:
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-20, 23:49
Replies: 187
Views: 14,973
Posted By xtreme2k
http://www.servethehome.com/intel-xeon-phi-knights...

http://www.servethehome.com/intel-xeon-phi-knights-landing-generation-now-available/

Some extra info on this thing :bow::bow:
Forum: Cloud Computing 2016-06-16, 13:43
Replies: 154
Views: 15,655
Posted By xtreme2k
Great discussions on upfront vs ongoing cost and...

Great discussions on upfront vs ongoing cost and gives me something to think about.

I love to get some benchmarks using AWS EC2 on the c4.large/c4.xlarge/c4.2xlarge actual 4096K FFT it/sec...
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-15, 11:23
Replies: 7
Views: 1,098
Posted By xtreme2k
My understanding is 188 it/s is a good speed for...

My understanding is 188 it/s is a good speed for a Haswell-E quad core.
The board is amazing now looking at some reviews. I must admit DDR4 ECC SODIMM is not an easy find :smile:

Plenty of...
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-14, 12:38
Replies: 7
Views: 1,098
Posted By xtreme2k
Please post the 4096K FFT benchmark with 1...

Please post the 4096K FFT benchmark with 1 worker/4(1620) or 14(2683) threads results.

Use the following in prime.txt to cut to the chase

MinBenchFFT=4096
MaxBenchFFT=4096
BenchTime=30...
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-14, 11:00
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
Love to see the benchmark and comparisons between...

Love to see the benchmark and comparisons between the V4 and the v3 and 2400 vs 2133:smile::tu:

All I need is the 4096K 1/14t times:bow:
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-09, 09:44
Replies: 38
Views: 4,856
Posted By xtreme2k
Same thing is happening with mine. ...

Same thing is happening with mine.
http://users.wondercom.com.au/xtreme2k/DellT5810/P95Temp.PNG

I suspect the power budget (145w) is all used up.

It isn't throttling even though my temps are...
Forum: Hardware 2016-06-06, 11:25
Replies: 38
Views: 4,856
Posted By xtreme2k
This is a slower brother to the E5-2697V3 14C/28T...

This is a slower brother to the E5-2697V3 14C/28T 35MB L3

P95 LL very well on this on a single worker with 12-14 threads.
Forum: Software 2016-04-27, 11:09
Replies: 38
Views: 2,547
Posted By xtreme2k
My suggestions Benchmark can be manually...

My suggestions

Benchmark can be manually requested
Benchmark can run automatically prior to the start of a LL
Benchmark can run automatically when new CPU instructions, cache size, new P95...
Forum: Hardware 2016-04-18, 04:55
Replies: 187
Views: 14,973
Posted By xtreme2k
This thing is rather interesting as seems to run...

This thing is rather interesting as seems to run as a standalone processor and intel's notes mention it is Binary compatible with Xeon. Whatever that means. It should run Windows (with the right...
Forum: Software 2016-03-30, 11:57
Replies: 182
Views: 31,767
Posted By xtreme2k
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz CPU...

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2697 v3 @ 2.60GHz
CPU speed: 2594.02 MHz, 14 hyperthreaded cores
CPU features: Prefetch, SSE, SSE2, SSE4, AVX, AVX2, FMA
L1 cache size: 32 KB
L2 cache size: 256 KB, L3...
Forum: Hardware 2016-03-01, 23:08
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
I ran the benchmark again focusing on 4096K+ FFT....

I ran the benchmark again focusing on 4096K+ FFT. It takes an incredibly long time to run and most of the time running different combos of workers and threads. It would be good if George would...
Forum: Software 2016-02-11, 02:44
Replies: 25
Views: 1,679
Posted By xtreme2k
Madpoo You can use...

Madpoo
You can use http://www.hwinfo.com/download.php
This is the best monitor app I have seen, especially in sensor mode. It's free as well. It tells if CPU temp and drills down to individual...
Forum: Hardware 2016-02-08, 07:48
Replies: 17
Views: 1,498
Posted By xtreme2k
I am actually surprised the difference between...

I am actually surprised the difference between 6700K and others (6600/K/6500) are quite huge in applications such as rendering, encoding, sysmark and others. (Ignoring P95 for now)
Their costs...
Forum: Hardware 2016-02-05, 05:12
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
That is very interesting. I guess when we move to...

That is very interesting. I guess when we move to 5120KB FFT then I would loose the advantage. In fact we aren't that far away.

Should've got the 2696v3/2699v3 with 45MB L3 then :bow:
Forum: Information & Answers 2016-02-05, 05:04
Replies: 17
Views: 908
Posted By xtreme2k
Since P4HT with Windows XP I have never had...

Since P4HT with Windows XP I have never had problems with Windows and prime95. As long as you don't run more threads then physical cores my experience had been positive.

WinXP and later is smart...
Forum: Hardware 2016-02-03, 05:05
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
It's interesting with these Xeon E5v3/i7 5xxx it...

It's interesting with these Xeon E5v3/i7 5xxx it is best to run 1 worker with multiple threads. It is clearly better than any other combinations. Not sure on the underlying reason but on the surface...
Forum: Hardware 2016-02-01, 11:23
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
It's interesting to see 1 worker vs multiple...

It's interesting to see 1 worker vs multiple workers that 1 worker is actually faster throughout. Am I reading this right?
eg -
14 cpu 1 worker - 509 it/s
14 cpu 14 workers - 371 it/s

...
Forum: Hardware 2016-02-01, 05:33
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
Thanks I will give that a try tonight. As I...

Thanks I will give that a try tonight.

As I see it the 12 workers 12 threads benchmark time (2.329 ms) is very close to the actual LL 1 worker 12 threads (around 2.3-2.4 ms), I would expect the...
Forum: Hardware 2016-01-31, 23:54
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
Is there a way just to test the 1 worker 4096K...

Is there a way just to test the 1 worker 4096K FFT speed? For 1-14 cores without the need to run the full bench?

The initial results on 12 threads on 12 cpu (leaving me with 2 cpu for other...
Forum: Hardware 2016-01-29, 13:39
Replies: 822
Views: 122,347
Posted By xtreme2k
First run on my Single Xeon E5-2697V3 128GB ECC...

First run on my Single Xeon E5-2697V3 128GB ECC DDR4-2133:smile:

The 28 threads result is very much screwed. Apart from that (the HT results) there are improvements as more cores are added. ...
Forum: GPU Computing 2013-12-24, 09:24
Replies: 3,387
Views: 294,023
Posted By xtreme2k
Any advice to tweak my system for higher output?

Any advice to tweak my system for higher output?
Forum: GPU Computing 2012-12-27, 10:02
Replies: 3,387
Views: 294,023
Posted By xtreme2k
Hey guys, Got a new 670GTX (upgrade from...

Hey guys,

Got a new 670GTX (upgrade from 460GTX). I am now cracking at approx 195-200M/s (vs 150M/s) which is pretty poor given the upgrade. NV really made the new chip a pure gaming chip with...
Showing results 1 to 25 of 174

 
All times are UTC. The time now is 16:47.

Wed Oct 21 16:47:28 UTC 2020 up 41 days, 13:58, 1 user, load averages: 1.98, 1.85, 1.75

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

This forum has received and complied with 0 (zero) government requests for information.

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.
A copy of the license is included in the FAQ.