Forum: 15k Search
2005-07-17, 04:32
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 13,365
BTW, I tested k=25935 from n=183500 to n=220000...
BTW, I tested k=25935 from n=183500 to n=220000 and found one prime for n=219995 (already included in the table above). I don't plan to test this k any further.
I also tested k=67773 from n=183500...
|
|
Forum: 15k Search
2005-03-17, 07:37
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 13,365
I just found out that k=25935 had been already...
I just found out that k=25935 had been already tested by Thomas to 200k. It is listed on the 15k stats page (http://www.15k.org/stats.htm) but mistakenly as k=29535.
This k is not so promising but...
|
|
Forum: 15k Search
2005-03-17, 04:17
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 13,365
OK, thanks!
BTW, some k have been searched...
OK, thanks!
BTW, some k have been searched before and following primes are recored on Top-5000.
k=25935: 46144, 47396, 117344, 121855, 139225, 152803, 173518
k=373065: 178284, 161917, 150532,...
|
|
Forum: 15k Search
2005-03-17, 02:43
|
|
Replies: 13
Views: 13,365
Your approach is interesting. AFAIK when...
Your approach is interesting. AFAIK when selecting k's nobody tried to take into account the fact that LLR can process small k's much faster than larger ones. Possibly because the first version of...
|
