Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-06, 19:09
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,366
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-06, 18:42
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
I Not Do What You Do.
You guys are multiplying primes, then reasoning correctly within that framework.
I am using primes to create fractions/proportions:
Putting 7s onto (1+n30) as lowest prime factors leaves 5/7,...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-06, 18:15
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-06, 18:05
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 20:15
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 20:12
|
Replies: 8
Views: 1,366
Counting Goldbach Prime Pairs Up To...
Goldbach Prime Pairs Up To 8282 = (91squared+1), both numbers on number line (1+n30).
Others from (13+n30) + (19+n30) not counted.
(Primes 7 to 61, each minus 2, multiplied together) divided by...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 13:53
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 13:48
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
When 10metreh gets to ,"So that there are...
When 10metreh gets to ,"So that there are infinitely many primes of the form n squared -1" is where we differ. I am not saying at THAT moment, "therefore there are infinitely many twin primes". I am...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 12:52
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 12:43
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-03, 12:42
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
This is what l do know.
If l had said,...
This is what l do know.
If l had said, "1,000,000 pounds to anyone who understands what is being said here", there would be lots of correct answers.
What l wrote originally, although written in...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 20:09
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 20:07
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 20:03
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
Yes you can continue getting rid of 7s then 11s...
Yes you can continue getting rid of 7s then 11s then 13s, but why bother? We now have just 3 paired number sequences. The difference is that the other series were gotten rid of because EVERY member...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 19:13
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 19:10
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
Up to now with all the notation in the world,...
Up to now with all the notation in the world, everybody has failed. I use numbers and ×, -, +, ÷ and succeed. Who wins? The fact that the 'private language' brigade doesn't like it, l think is quite...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 17:56
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 17:50
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 17:37
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 13:34
|
Replies: 21
Views: 2,508
Collatz Conjecture Proof
This does not make any mistake or omission that you think it will!
1. The solution lies in correct 'tumbler' allignment, as in cracking a safe.
2. The correct allignment is (4 + 10n).
3. As...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 13:19
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
No! You've missed the point.
There can be NO...
No! You've missed the point.
There can be NO prime such that it will end the possibilty of twin primes. There can be NO highest, lowest prime factor of a pair, because the equation l wrote would...
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 12:52
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 12:50
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-03-02, 12:47
|
Replies: 20
Views: 2,184
|
Forum: Miscellaneous Math
2018-02-28, 10:25
|
Replies: 53
Views: 3,753
|