llrnet - source code?
 

Hi, is the source code of llrnet available? I would like to port it to other OSs and maybe create packages for them.

Here you are:

[URL]http://stats.rieselsieve.com/download/llrnet-sources.tgz[/URL]

If you get the chance please update the LLR version from 3.5 to 3.7.1c...

Thanks.

Carlos

[QUOTE=em99010pepe;124654]Here you are:

[URL]http://stats.rieselsieve.com/download/llrnet-sources.tgz[/URL]

If you get the chance please update the LLR version from 3.5 to 3.7.1c...

Thanks.

Carlos[/QUOTE]
I think LLR needs to be ported to graphics cards. Let's forget about this double-precision BS and just make a client. Even if it isn't mind-numbingly fast(I think it WILL be mind-numbingly fast), it will still be a way to increase throughput for the various prime searching projects.

[quote=jasong;124725]I think LLR needs to be ported to graphics cards. Let's forget about this double-precision BS and just make a client. Even if it isn't mind-numbingly fast(I think it WILL be mind-numbingly fast), it will still be a way to increase throughput for the various prime searching projects.[/quote]
Even if it's dog slow, it's got to be better than nothing.

[quote=Mini-Geek;124745]Even if it's dog slow, it's got to be better than nothing.[/quote]

wouldn't be worth the effort then...

[QUOTE=thommy;124811]wouldn't be worth the effort then...[/QUOTE]

Anything that increases the heat output is good imo:devil:
If I had an ATI card I would be running the F@H client on it.

IMO, if some programmer has to spend several weeks in order to get it working, and then the graphic cards are basically just producing heat out of expensive electricity, and the tests are taking one year because the n increases, then

- the programmers time is better spent finding a girlfriend
- the electricity is better spent making a cup of tea
- the money is better spent buying some real CPU.

I imagine well people letting run their entire computer to finish the stupid test on the graphic card.

Doing nothing is sometimes better than doing something just bacause one can.

H.

[QUOTE=em99010pepe;124654]Here you are:

[URL]http://stats.rieselsieve.com/download/llrnet-sources.tgz[/URL]

If you get the chance please update the LLR version from 3.5 to 3.7.1c...

Thanks.

Carlos[/QUOTE]

Did a new client ever come from this? From what I have read 3.7.1 is 10% faster then 3.5. I have no programming skills so just looking at the source code gives me a headache.


S.

[quote=Sloth;127161]Did a new client ever come from this? From what I have read 3.7.1 is 10% faster then 3.5. I have no programming skills so just looking at the source code gives me a headache.


S.[/quote]
I tried dropping the LLR 3.7.1 source into the LLRnet source tree (replacing the 3.5 source), but I just got a load of compile errors. Maybe we should all go over to the Riesel Sieve forum and start bugging them to make an "official" new version (they developed LLRnet in the first place, so if anyone can upgrade it to 3.7.1, they can)?

Does anyone still have the llrnet source code ?
Link is dead.

[QUOTE=PCZ;189439]Does anyone still have the llrnet source code ?
Link is dead.[/QUOTE]

[URL="http://pagesperso-orange.fr/jean.penne/index2.html"]This[/URL] works fine for me. Link to source is at the bottom of the page.

EDIT:- Whoops. Too fast. That is link to LLR source code. Ask ltd. He'll probably have a copy of the source code.