![]() |
[quote=em99010pepe;127016]I think you should add your octo...we need to clean Gary's mess.[/quote]
And more mess just around the corener... 300<k<400 is about done sieving. About 3 days now. You all will have plenty more of my mess to clean up then. Of course I'll be there with my scoop and shovel. :smile: But then...Anon will have the biggest mess of all to clean...100K-260K for k<=1001. Sorry Anon, but your mess is bigger than all of my messes combined there! :razz: Gary |
[quote=gd_barnes;127018]And more mess just around the corener...
300<k<400 is about done sieving. About 3 days now. You all will have plenty more of my mess to clean up then. Of course I'll be there with my scoop and shovel. :smile: But then...Anon will have the biggest mess of all to clean...100K-260K for k<=1001. Sorry Anon, but your mess is bigger than all of my messes combined there! :razz: Gary[/quote] Yeah, I know...I've got a big "mess". :wink: Fortunately the candidates are very small, so it's not as big as it seems. :smile: |
[QUOTE=IronBits;126997]
I also adjusted the pruning for hourly prunePeriod = 0.1 * 24 * 3600 -- hourly [/QUOTE] You have 10 hours in a day ? :blush: i would switch the value to prunePeriod = 3600 |
Good point. DOH!
Someone has a computer that's not working correctly and is not getting work. connection request from [B]19c2c462[/B]:1171 (socket 84) connection closed (socket 84) Everything else is looking great so far. I have over 50 cores working away without any problems so far. :smile: |
[quote=IronBits;127039]...
Everything else is looking great so far. I have over 50 cores working away without any problems so far. :smile:[/quote] Great! :smile: I take it your server will be the obvious choice for the next rally? :wink: |
I'm waiting for Beyond to crank it up another notch to see what happens.
If I can handle everything Beyond has states side, then yes, between all the Servers, we should be able to have a successful event. :smile: So long as someone keeps sending me knpairs.txt to keep the server topped of with plenty of work. ;) |
Maybe BlisteringSheep can shift some of his pharmage this way to.
If I can handle Beyond and BlisteringSheep, that would be something. :surprised |
[quote=IronBits;127043]Maybe BlisteringSheep can shift some of his pharmage this way to.
If I can handle Beyond and BlisteringSheep, that would be something. :surprised[/quote] Most of Sheep's farms are consisted of PowerPC machines, which work great for sieving, but they won't work at all for LLR, since there's no version of LLR available for any non-x86 architectures. Unfortunately, a non-x86 LLR would probably need to be written from scratch (at least the base components that do the actual crunching) because LLR has a lot of x86-dependent assembler code in it. |
[quote=IronBits;127039]
connection request from [B]19c2c462[/B]:1171 (socket 84) connection closed (socket 84) :smile:[/quote] That's Beyond! [quote=IronBits;127042] So long as someone keeps sending me knpairs.txt to keep the server topped of with plenty of work. ;)[/quote] Just keep controlling the size of knpairs.txt, when it gets below 80 Kb it's better to add more work. Tonight I am going to take some numbers from server port 100, because knpairs.txt size is up to 3558 KB size, and post them here to you. |
[quote=em99010pepe;127049]Just keep controlling the size of knpairs.txt, when it gets below 80 Kb it's better to add more work. Tonight I am going to take some numbers from server port 100, because knpairs.txt size is up to 3558 KB size, and post them here to you.[/quote]
Carlos, could you make sure to let me know exactly what range you take out of the port 100 server's knpairs and give to IronBits? I'll need to know that when I process the results (because in order to determine the lowest outstanding n for each server, I need to be able to compare the results with the knpairs.txt in that server). |
[quote=Anonymous;127052]Carlos, could you make sure to let me know exactly what range you take out of the port 100 server's knpairs and give to IronBits? I'll need to know that when I process the results (because in order to determine the lowest outstanding n for each server, I need to be able to compare the results with the knpairs.txt in that server).[/quote]
Of course, I will make it public. I was thinking in giving him 310k-315k... |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 06:02. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.