i updated all ranges for 301<k<1001 on the summary page.
i inserted the missing primes Gary wrote in the threads for drive #1 and #3.
the page for the Riesel-problem is ok now too (edited the error Siemilink found), and the corresponding k in 10^5-page.
i plan to insert all primes found in the last month (mostly by Burt in the range 1000<k<3000 and higher ones).
the menu (left side of [url]www.rieselprime.org[/url]) shows the old dates but the pages itself contains the last edit date.
i will change these in the near future.
while my vacation i fill in some small primes for 10^7<k10^9 for n<50k to delete all phrases like "(90 primes to 50k)".
Karsten

[quote=kar_bon;137843]i updated all ranges for 301<k<1001 on the summary page.
i inserted the missing primes Gary wrote in the threads for drive #1 and #3.
the page for the Riesel-problem is ok now too (edited the error Siemilink found), and the corresponding k in 10^5-page.
i plan to insert all primes found in the last month (mostly by Burt in the range 1000<k<3000 and higher ones).
the menu (left side of [URL="http://www.rieselprime.org"]www.rieselprime.org[/URL]) shows the old dates but the pages itself contains the last edit date.
i will change these in the near future.
while my vacation i fill in some small primes for 10^7<k10^9 for n<50k to delete all phrases like "(90 primes to 50k)".
Karsten[/quote]


OUTSTANDING Karsten!! And I was thinking about assisting you in some way with that effort. I know what a huge undertaking it must be.

Thanks for updating things!


Gary

next updates are online.
perhaps there're some primes missing in the team-drive-pages.
i begun to convert the date-format from dd.mm.yyyy into yyyy/mm/dd for the data-pages (first NPLB team drive #1 and 300<k<10000-pages).
next pages will follow.
(to Gary: also "nnn (...)" into "nnn, (...)" !)

For those interested, the sieving effort for: k=401-1001 for n=600K-1M.

is now at 2.35T and moving.... :smile: and a backup of the dat file has been sent to Gary. Only have to go to like 20 to 25T

sieving is completed to 4.1T

Second spot to PrimeSearch on total of number of primes. Well done.

i updated now all edited files on [url]www.rieselprime.org[/url] (without any problems this time).
so no need to refer to the de-server. (will make a note there)

i finished also updating other pages like 1001<k<1999 for 10k<n<35k (data from henryzz and me and small primes from lavalamp (coming soon)).

i got no access to rieselprime.org again!

so for now and next times:

if [url]www.rieselprime.org[/url] is not available, try [url]www.rieselprime.de[/url]!

there's a notice to go to the org-domain but if not available go further (second link there)!

this time i made some changes and many new primes from lavalamp (20000<k<200000,0<n<10000(0)).

hope this helps.

the k<300 page on [url]www.rieselprime.org[/url] is available again with current data so far.

i also updated the 'Historicals and Milestones' thread with some new data!

[quote=kar_bon;140269]the k<300 page on [URL="http://www.rieselprime.org"]www.rieselprime.org[/URL] is available again with current data so far.

i also updated the 'Historicals and Milestones' thread with some new data![/quote]


EXCELLENT WORK Karsten! And thanks for checking and finding some errors on my page.

I think you mentioned in a PM removing the 'missing at Primesearch' verbiage from the k=300-2000 page. Here is what I would suggest instead:

Just put an asterisk by the primes that are missing at Primesearch with a note at the top about what the asterisk means. Or you can use some other method of highlighting them to let us know that they are missing. I think that will save us a lot of time in the future knowing which ones are missing.

SOME day we will have our threads, your k=300-2000 page, the top-5000 site, your k<300 page, my k<300 page (which I may stop updating now that yours is up to date), and Wilfred Keller's Prothsearch k<300 page all in sync with one another! :smile:


Thanks,
Gary

[QUOTE=gd_barnes;140371]EXCELLENT WORK Karsten! And thanks for checking and finding some errors on my page.

I think you mentioned in a PM removing the 'missing at Primesearch' verbiage from the k=300-2000 page. Here is what I would suggest instead:

Just put an asterisk by the primes that are missing at Primesearch with a note at the top about what the asterisk means. Or you can use some other method of highlighting them to let us know that they are missing. I think that will save us a lot of time in the future knowing which ones are missing.
[/QUOTE]

i deleted the remark when the prime is listed in the prime-overview-page at PrimeSearch.
many are not yet included there. i will not remark the new primes found by NPLB.

[QUOTE]
SOME day we will have our threads, your k=300-2000 page, the top-5000 site, your k<300 page, my k<300 page (which I may stop updating now that yours is up to date), and Wilfred Keller's Prothsearch k<300 page all in sync with one another! :smile:
[/QUOTE]

that's my intention to display [b]all[/b] primes [b]without missing or errors[/b] for all k's ever tested and to make [b]one[/b] page for all Riesel-Primes!

Karsten