[quote=em99010pepe;148725]You thought well but I changed my mind...let's see if we can find a prime everyday from now on on drive 1.
So we want to finish this by the end of the year?
Carlos

Edit: Made some calculations and at this pace we won't finish Drive 1 until the end of the year. We need Lennart, Glenn, Brucifer, kar_bon, Beyond, henryzz, jokern_3000, Flatlander...[/quote]
I'm on server #3 so you can't see how little or much I actually do around here. Well, that was my plan until I read "maintained by em99010pepe". lol

reserving n=547.7K to 550K for port 400

Taking 550.0 - 550.1

I'm in the process of moving cores from Base 5 to here. I will put them on port 400 for now, until I can determine what I REALLY want them to do over here.

9 cores total (all 2.4 ghz), but it will take me awhile to empty the queues on some. I have more cores remaining on Base 5 doing manual work. Haven't determined what I will do with them yet either.

If anyone has any suggestions as to where to utilize them, fire away.

Hope this helps. Maybe we can beat yearend for this drive.

[quote=MyDogBuster;149064]I'm in the process of moving cores from Base 5 to here. I will put them on port 400 for now, until I can determine what I REALLY want them to do over here.

9 cores total (all 2.4 ghz), but it will take me awhile to empty the queues on some. I have more cores remaining on Base 5 doing manual work. Haven't determined what I will do with them yet either.

If anyone has any suggestions as to where to utilize them, fire away.

Hope this helps. Maybe we can beat yearend for this drive.[/quote]


I'd suggest putting them all on this drive. Manual ranges or LLRnet...it doesn't matter.

I'm hoping 2 LLRnet rallies by year end will get us there. At the current pace, we're looking at mid-late Jan. I think. I added an 8th quad to port 400 yesterday for at least a couple of days to boost it a little.

Thanks for asking and for your contribution!


Gary

[quote]I'd suggest putting them all on this drive. Manual ranges or LLRnet...it doesn't matter.
[/quote]

Okay, I'll split them up.

Taking 550.1 - 550.7

I think we are averaging 10 000 candidates per day on llrnet.
Mini-Geek and MyDogBuster, how much per day do you guys do with the manual client?

Carlos

[QUOTE]Mini-Geek and MyDogBuster, how much per day do you guys do with the manual client?

[/QUOTE]

I have 8 cores dedicated to manual stuff and 14 on LLRNET.

[quote=em99010pepe;149182]I think we are averaging 10 000 candidates per day on llrnet.
Mini-Geek and MyDogBuster, how much per day do you guys do with the manual client?

Carlos[/quote]
One core will run ~3530 in ~30 days, so one core is about 118 per day, making both cores finish a total of [B]236[/B] (there's the number you were looking for; the rest is just me having fun with stats :smile:) per day. I run ~42.37 times slower than LLRnet, I run about 2.36% of NPLB's drive 1 work. With ~42 more dual core Athlons I'd match the rest of NPLB's drive 1 work (in reality, knowing Athlons LLR much slower than Intels, I wouldn't do that, but in theory that's about right).

I don't know whether this is even worth posting, but could you manually remove the first few candidates from the n=550.9K file? I had access to a relatively fast machine for a short time, and I used it to take a random shot at the top 5000 prime list. Unfortunately, I won't have access to the machine for quite a while, so I won't be able to complete the range. Anyway, the results are:

459*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 476D81B8AB93B4E6 Time : 400.233 sec.
475*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 0CF593645470C446 Time : 409.060 sec.
487*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: CE7B8C7C22E1E74A Time : 407.048 sec.
607*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 987FBCF57CD7E716 Time : 410.726 sec.
627*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 7755B1BC5359A82D Time : 408.789 sec.
649*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 78B2F9D69197D8E4 Time : 409.356 sec.
789*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: C5617FE2C5D2A6E6 Time : 408.604 sec.
799*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 483A5C4A77086371 Time : 407.735 sec.
805*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EF6B7030B1EC76BA Time : 412.297 sec.
837*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 89055F28C68B79AB Time : 407.490 sec.
855*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 1FC9A2892D6C0D96 Time : 408.525 sec.
927*2^550901-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: F8D6E1C467078C97 Time : 408.293 sec.
551*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 2E8104B214C5ABCB Time : 417.207 sec.
555*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: A9612EE36990BF2B Time : 420.103 sec.
585*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: A46D22E34D606B12 Time : 422.803 sec.
705*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 47A848A02CEFE25B Time : 415.925 sec.
815*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 496DB2639B7305C3 Time : 412.998 sec.
887*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EB76B9FE9C148B7D Time : 411.161 sec.
893*2^550902-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: EE5D9B1942FF4621 Time : 410.030 sec.
511*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 8BF7E5C25FAD71A3 Time : 408.932 sec.
553*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: 19F3F2F8A8AFEA43 Time : 407.125 sec.
559*2^550903-1 is not prime. LLR Res64: DD199F0D0B977CED Time : 411.822 sec.

542.0-542.6 is complete. lresults attached. Two primes found, already reported.
Estimate for 547.1-547.3 is 11/24. Estimate for full 547.1-547.7 range is 12/16.