![]() |
Taking 541.4-541.6 to feed LLRnet C443.
|
I can tell for sure that 530.6k-532.0k is done but I am just waiting for the end of the rally to send Anon's the results file.
I also need to add more work to server C443 to keep busy all clients until next Thursday. So taking 541.6-542.0. Carlos |
[quote=em99010pepe;141295]I can tell for sure that 530.6k-532.0k is done but I am just waiting for the end of the rally to send Anon's the results file.
I also need to add more work to server C443 to keep busy all clients until next Thursday. So taking 541.6-542.0. Carlos[/quote] Carlos, Thank all of your contributors to C443 for me. They're smoking through the ranges! :smile: I'll post some more manual files here shortly. If you need more, just keep grabbing them. Assuming that everything goes as expected on the sieving from Bruce, it could still be as late as this coming weekend before we officially get the new drive started so feel to continue taking ranges here as needed. Gary |
Gary,
At least 10 cores will be permanently connected to C443 so I'll keep adding work as necessary. Carlos |
[quote=gd_barnes;141309]Carlos,
Thank all of your contributors to C443 for me. They're smoking through the ranges! :smile: I'll post some more manual files here shortly. If you need more, just keep grabbing them. Assuming that everything goes as expected on the sieving from Bruce, it could still be as late as this coming weekend before we officially get the new drive started so feel to continue taking ranges here as needed. Gary[/quote] Hey Gary, I noticed that 530.6K-532.0K has been marked as completed by LLRnet C443, even though neither you nor I have processed the results for it yet. For the purposes of consistency, could you please just leave LLRnet ranges as "in progress" until they have actually been processed? That's the way I've been doing it, since that helps me to be able to easily tell, at a glance, which ranges from which servers have yet to be processed. Thanks! :smile: Anon :smile: |
[quote=Anonymous;141319]Hey Gary, I noticed that 530.6K-532.0K has been marked as completed by LLRnet C443, even though neither you nor I have processed the results for it yet. For the purposes of consistency, could you please just leave LLRnet ranges as "in progress" until they have actually been processed? That's the way I've been doing it, since that helps me to be able to easily tell, at a glance, which ranges from which servers have yet to be processed.
Thanks! :smile: Anon :smile:[/quote] OK, will do. Carlos reported that he had checked and that all of the results were there but since you use that as an indicator for processing, I'll just leave it alone until you process them. |
[quote=gd_barnes;141327]OK, will do. Carlos reported that he had checked and that all of the results were there but since you use that as an indicator for processing, I'll just leave it alone until you process them.[/quote]
Thanks. I'll see about getting them processed sometime tonight. :smile: |
530.6K-532K completed by LLRnet C443, results emailed to Gary. :smile:
|
540.6-541.0 done, no primes
|
[quote=Mini-Geek;140887]540.0-.1, .3-.4 complete, no primes
ETA for 540.0-.6 is still 9/24 ETA for next n=2x100 range is 9/14 (maybe will be reported 9/15 if it finishes late)[/quote] Those dates are 4 days later than originally planned due to me running two 48 hour LLRnet things for rallies. |
541.0K-541.2K complete, one prime: 635*2^541112-1 (already reported)
|
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:54. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.