505.0K-506.3K completed by LLRnet C400, results emailed to Gary. :smile:

485.4-.5, .9-486.0 complete, no additional primes. This is the last of my 485.0-486.0 range. lresults.txt's and prime.txt's attached.
530.0-530.6 has begun, ETA ~30 days (August 23-30).

[quote=Mini-Geek;138258]485.4-.5, .9-486.0 complete, no additional primes. This is the last of my 485.0-486.0 range. lresults.txt's and prime.txt's attached.
530.0-530.6 has begun, ETA ~30 days (August 23-30).[/quote]

Woo hoo! We're now fully complete to n=500K and nearly complete to n=510K! ETA to 510K is ~2 days on ports 300 and 400.


Gary

I have now verified all results files up to n=500K on this drive vs. the top-5000 site, the NPLB drive 1 page, the rieselprime.org site, and post 1 in this thread.

Primes on the top-5000 site looked good. 927*2^494005-1 was missing from post 1, the drive 1 page, and the rieselprime.org site.

Karsten, I have now added the prime to post 1 here. Please add it to your 2 pages. Apparently the prime was not reported in our primes thread so we missed it.


Thanks,
Gary

Results files for n=500K-510K have now all been processed for the 2 servers and the 2 ranges are now considered complete. No missing results were found.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;138396]Results files for n=500K-510K have now all been processed for the 2 servers and the 2 ranges are now considered complete. No missing results were found.


Gary[/quote]
So, I take it that you did the results processing for the remaining ranges (500K-505K and 506.3K-510K) yourself? Or do I still have to process those yet?

[quote=Anonymous;138402]So, I take it that you did the results processing for the remaining ranges (500K-505K and 506.3K-510K) yourself? Or do I still have to process those yet?[/quote]


Yep, they're done. No need to process them to me.

I did them because the range that you sent me for n=505K-506.3K was missing many results from Carlos server >506.3K up to n=~506335 but included many results from Adam's server <506K. I had to take what you sent me, the missing results from Carlos server >506.3K plus the results from Adam's server up to 510K minus the ones that you included <506K to get them all.

This happened because the 505K-506.3K range from Carlos's server was not a nice clean range because the server was stopped with some gaps in it for n=~505.8K-506335. In other words, what you sent me for his server's range wasn't what was processed by his server.

I had subsequently sent those gapped k/n pairs to Adam's server such that the total # of results of the 2 exactly matched the k/n pairs in the original sieved file. You filled in the gaps to make it clean but I think you had ran some k/n pairs yourself that you didn't need to.

It was messy enough that I thought it was creating more confusion than necessary to have you send the rest of n=505K-510K to me.


Gary

[quote=gd_barnes;138407]Yep, they're done. No need to process them to me.

I did them because the range that you sent me for n=505K-506.3K was missing many results from Carlos server >506.3K up to n=~506335 but included many results from Adam's server <506K. I had to take what you sent me, the missing results from Carlos server >506.3K plus the results from Adam's server up to 510K minus the ones that you included <506K to get them all.

This happened because the 505K-506.3K range from Carlos's server was not a nice clean range because the server was stopped with some gaps in it for n=~505.8K-506335. In other words, what you sent me for his server's range wasn't what was processed by his server.

I had subsequently sent those gapped k/n pairs to Adam's server such that the total # of results of the 2 exactly matched the k/n pairs in the original sieved file. You filled in the gaps to make it clean but I think you had ran some k/n pairs yourself that you didn't need to.

It was messy enough that I thought it was creating more confusion than necessary to have you send the rest of n=505K-510K to me.


Gary[/quote]
Oh, I see now. I must have missed all that since it was part of the posts that I generally skimmed over after coming back from vacation. :rolleyes: Thus I assumed that the "506.3K" break-off point was exactly that, no fancy stuff necessary. :smile:

Thanks for taking care of it for me. :smile:

530.3-.4 complete, no primes. .0-.1 should finish tomorrow night.

510.0K-510.5K complete, no primes. lresults attached. :smile:

530.0-.1 complete, no primes