![]() |
[quote=henryzz;127591]i have finally finished 337.6-337.8[/quote]
Karsten and Anon, This completes n=320K-340K for k=400-1001. Karsten, I'll verify that the primes I have listed in the 1st post here are the same as those listed on your NPLB web page for drive 1. Is there anything else left to verify? Among us, we'll need to get the range completed and primes reported for all k's at Primesearch. I'll work on it some today and tomorrow and will be glad to do all of it within the next week as time permits. Karsten, After making sure all of the primes are on your Rieselprime site for this range (I can cross check it if you want), can you show the range of 320-340K complete for each of these k's? Personally, I think it just looks 'cool' to see that range completed for 351 k's! :smile: If not, no big deal. I know it'll be kind of a hassle to update the individual 20K ranges like that while we still have lower gaps to fill. Thanks, Gary |
yes, please double check following pages:
- TeamDrive #1 for range 333.2k to 340.0k - TeamDrive #2 for range 320.0k to 333.2k - Primes page table for primes sorted by k-values - 300<k<2000 page at rieselprime org (will update all these the next hour with latest primes found, i think 2 primes not submitted yet to Top5000:-() what about checking all resultfile: you the LLR results and i the LLRnet results. so we are sure no prime left behind before complete this range at PrimeSearch! karsten |
[quote=kar_bon;127628]yes, please double check following pages:
- TeamDrive #1 for range 333.2k to 340.0k - TeamDrive #2 for range 320.0k to 333.2k - Primes page table for primes sorted by k-values - 300<k<2000 page at rieselprime org (will update all these the next hour with latest primes found, i think 2 primes not submitted yet to Top5000:-() what about checking all resultfile: you the LLR results and i the LLRnet results. so we are sure no prime left behind before complete this range at PrimeSearch! karsten[/quote] This sounds good. I'm sure there are a few manual LLR results that I don't have. I copied them on to different home machines so I'll have to get them merged all together and see what ranges are missing. Yes, I agree we should wait until we can cross-check all results, the Rieselprime site, and the NPLB site for consistency before reporting to Primesearch. I'll start on this process Monday night sometime. Gary |
1 Attachment(s)
353.4-353.6 done
1 prime already reported. lresults.txt attached |
Beyond is reserving n=400K-410K for manual LLRing.
|
1 Attachment(s)
[QUOTE=BlisteringSheep;127250]Taking 392.0-392.2 and 392.2-392.4[/QUOTE]
Both ranges completed, found 1 prime (reported to other thread & to Top5000): 989*2^392020-1 is prime! Time : 212.824 sec. |
Taking
392.6-392.8 392.8-393.0 |
346.4K-346.8K done, no primes, result files sent to Gary.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Carlos's port 300 LLRnet server has completed 358.7-359.3. lresults are attached.
|
[quote=Anonymous;128011]Carlos's port 300 LLRnet server has completed 358.7-359.3. lresults are attached.[/quote]
We're now almost done with the k=400-1001 n=340K-360K range. Once we get all LLRnet results to n=360K, Karsten, we'll only be waiting on you to complete a couple of your ranges for that n-range. (lol) |
Carlos,
Would you like to pull n=378K-392K out of your port 300 server? I need to send Beyond ~160000 more tests by Monday and that range would work well. It'd still leave an n=~5K range in the server to be processed. For the admin's and your info., the first and last k/n pair in the range would be: 427 378001 957 392000 Thanks, Gary |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 20:56. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.