mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Conjectures 'R Us (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=81)
-   -   Report top-5000 primes here (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=9782)

gd_barnes 2015-12-21 19:18

Very nice! That's our first proof in a while.

rebirther 2016-01-13 17:04

[URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=120886"]24*414^391179+1[/URL] (1023717 digits) found by ardo

This find solves the base S414.
[URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=120432"] [/URL]

gd_barnes 2016-01-13 18:49

[QUOTE=rebirther;422250][URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=120886"]24*414^391179+1[/URL] (1023717 digits) found by ardo

This find solves the base S414.
[/QUOTE]

Congrats! :smile:

MyDogBuster 2016-01-13 19:26

You guys are getting on a roll. Keep it up. :smile::buddy:

pepi37 2016-02-03 15:52

S 737 is proven :)
 
[URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=121003"]4 *737^269302+1 is prime[/URL] :smile: ( 772216 digits long)
And it is also Generalized Fermat at 32 position :)

pinhodecarlos 2016-02-03 16:12

[QUOTE=pepi37;425084][URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=121003"]4 *737^269302+1 is prime[/URL] :smile: ( 772216 digits long)
And it is also Generalized Fermat at 32 position :)[/QUOTE]

Are you sure about your G15 proof-code used?

pepi37 2016-02-03 17:34

[QUOTE=pinhodecarlos;425087]Are you sure about your G15 proof-code used?[/QUOTE]
Yes, why not?
I use Prime95 for processing, so it is OK to Prime95 is awarded as software :smile:
LLR is used in second stage for 100% verification.

lorgix 2016-02-03 17:44

[QUOTE=pepi37;425098]Yes, why not?
I use Prime95 for processing, so it is OK to Prime95 is awarded as software :smile:
LLR is used in second stage for 100% verification.[/QUOTE]

GIMPS wasn't involved though.

pepi37 2016-02-03 17:47

[QUOTE=lorgix;425100]GIMPS wasn't involved though.[/QUOTE]
But it was added automatically when I choose Prime 95
I will contact admin to solve my case :)

Batalov 2016-02-03 17:48

Prime95 [FONT=&quot]≠[/FONT] GIMPS. GIMPS was not used.

Also, the last parameter on the proof-string must be the proof software, which is in this case was LLR (Prime95 only does a PRP test for Proth numbers, not a proof).

:two cents:

pepi37 2016-02-03 17:55

[QUOTE=Batalov;425103]Prime95 [FONT=&quot]≠[/FONT] GIMPS. GIMPS was not used.

Also, the last parameter on the proof-string must be the proof software, which is in this case was LLR (Prime95 only does a PRP test for Proth numbers, not a proof).

:two cents:[/QUOTE]

Yes, yes, I mail to Mr Caldwell and ask him to fix it. :smile:


All times are UTC. The time now is 23:01.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.