[QUOTE=SaneMur;277262]

Looks like in the 800/sec and 900/sec range for 2 of them.[/QUOTE]

Think this will slow the first time it has to test from 6000 to 10000. Typically this would be 15 mins.

Certainly faster than my one core - on M(52) I average 450, and that is only running up to n=6,000.

So you have some fast looking cores.

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;277253]

For the in.txt file, set the parameters in all three cases as follows:

maxn 10000
hashsize 65536
sievelimit 134217728
timesave 60
boundforquickcheck 4096
vpscount 100
nashsievelimit 500

c0 1.5
c1 5.0
nash_check 1
number_of_sievebits 7
11 64
13 128
15 256
18 512
21 1024
24 2048
27 4096

smith_check 1
number_of_levels 8
11 50
18 100
25 200
36 500
57 1000
69 2000
77 3000
91 6000
[/QUOTE]

And at some point in time I will need an explanation of what all of that is!

maxn [B]10000[/B] - our target
hashsize 65536
sievelimit 134217728
timesave 60
boundforquickcheck 4096
[B]vpscount 100[/B]- our target
nashsievelimit 500

c0 1.5
c1 5.0
[B]nash_check 1[/B] - the sieving limits
number_of_sievebits 7
11 64
13 128
15 256
18 512
21 1024
24 2048
27 4096

[B]smith_check 1[/B] 1 = use it, 0 says don't
[B]number_of_levels[/B] 8 - count the number of cutoff points listed below
[B]11 50[/B] - this means that if the y has not achieved 11 primes by n=50 it gets dropped
18 100
25 200
36 500
57 1000
69 2000
77 3000
91 6000

The smith_check varies according to the M(x) level - this is pretty well the same for 52,58,60 and 66 but different above this level. Through trial and error I have worked out the best cut off points for each level.

Record Table
 

I took a peek at the [B]Record Table[/B] that is being written.

I saw one entry has 100 primes found by 7458 and another has 102 in 8799.

So will this software just keep running until it is interrupted, updating the records as it finds them, or will it reach a stopping point eventually?

Rapid Changes
 

What a difference giving the software lots of search time makes!

Last night before I went to bed, E60 was sadly lagging behind E58 and E66.

E60's best run was 89 primes.
E66's best run was 103 primes.
E58's best run was 104 primes.

This morning, E58 was still at 104, but with a much smaller exponent (9024) than the night before, but E60 was now leading the pack with 107 by 9409! E66 also has a frequency of 107 up to exponent 9883.

The moral of the story: Don't write off your underperformers early on, give them some time to crank out good results!

[QUOTE=SaneMur;277343]What a difference giving the software lots of search time makes!

Last night before I went to bed, E60 was sadly lagging behind E58 and E66.

E60's best run was 89 primes.
E66's best run was 103 primes.
E58's best run was 104 primes.

This morning, E58 was still at 104, but with a much smaller exponent (9024) than the night before, but E60 was now leading the pack with 107 by 9409! E66 also has a frequency of 107 up to exponent 9883.

The moral of the story: Don't write off your underperformers early on, give them some time to crank out good results![/QUOTE]

Greetings from Istanbul!

I suppose that almost every one of the records for all three of the Ms that you have taken will be beaten once you have seriously multiplied the number of iterations from where you started.

This will take less than 6 months, perhaps faster. Interested to hear your full iteration times for each M level you are achieving. M(52) iterations take me 3 days.

The key checkpoints traditionally - and the most sought after records (as far as I am concerned) are:
[LIST][*]A 12- and 13-Cunnigham chain[*]Most primes at n=30[*]Most at n=100[*]Most at n=1000 - would like to see 75 primes here[*]Most at n=3000 - 100 is very possible![*]Most at n=10000 - although the best of 121 looks out of sight, in fact I never found any other Riesel with more than 114. Several Sierpinskis of 115+ have been found.[*]Quickest to 150 primes[*]First to 172 primes[/LIST]

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;277433]Greetings from Istanbul!

I suppose that almost every one of the records for all three of the Ms that you have taken will be beaten once you have seriously multiplied the number of iterations from where you started.
[/QUOTE]

Is there a "global record list" that is being maintained? If so, is it available for viewing?

For an iteration, do you mean when it goes from like 11 to 12? If so, that doesn't take too long (about 20 hours), even on my slow machine:

[CODE]
R 33425906187483 66 100/7458 100/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=70682 Sat Nov 05 12:11:04 2011
R 32364555002465 66 100/9760 100/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=71459 Sat Nov 05 12:48:18 2011
R 34125260219139 66 100/7100 102/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=84685 Sat Nov 05 17:58:17 2011
R 31713628929771 66 100/8135 103/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=89334 Sat Nov 05 19:40:30 2011
R 31643551699445 66 100/7782 102/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=112692 Sun Nov 06 03:40:43 2011
R 33774397955231 66 100/6700 107/10000 K=##### iteration=11 I=115648 Sun Nov 06 05:09:28 2011
R 37089318326919 66 100/5788 107/10000 K=##### iteration=12 I=2162 Sun Nov 06 07:43:00 2011
[/CODE]

Of course, it took a while for the first entry to occur, and it was obviously on iteration 12 a while before posting its first result fir I=12 but assuming they cancel each other out timewise (and it is very likely not the case) that is what I have.

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;277433]
This will take less than 6 months, perhaps faster. Interested to hear your full iteration times for each M level you are achieving. M(52) iterations take me 3 days.
[/QUOTE]

Wait until I migrate this to one of the faster systems coming back from rentals. Each one has 6 cores and 12 threads, each at 5.2 GHz. I am also building a 5.4 GHz i7-990X system, so I should be able to have 24 threads going by the end of the month if you give me work to do. Better yet, teach me how to set those parameters for different E values, and I can let several of them crank.

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;277433]
The key checkpoints traditionally - and the most sought after records (as far as I am concerned) are:

[LIST][*]A 12- and 13-Cunnigham chain[*]Most primes at n=30[*]Most at n=100[*]Most at n=1000 - would like to see 75 primes here[*]Most at n=3000 - 100 is very possible![*]Most at n=10000 - although the best of 121 looks out of sight, in fact I never found any other Riesel with more than 114. Several Sierpinskis of 115+ have been found.[*]Quickest to 150 primes[*]First to 172 primes[/LIST]
[/QUOTE]

Can you post your records on which k values hold these records for Riesel Primes? Is there a chain of 11 for Riesel data?

[QUOTE=SaneMur;277482]Is there a "global record list" that is being maintained? If so, is it available for viewing?

[/QUOTE]

See post 229 and 230, and posts since that time.

If you have lots of cores, then we are in business! I can post the check points I reached for the other M values when I get back to Kabul in a couple of days.

[QUOTE]Is there a chain of 11 for Riesel data?

[/QUOTE]

Yup lots of CC11s. I find the lack of a CC12 to be perplexing.

I will soldier on with M(52)

I will also post the most up to date list I have for absolute records, Riesel and Sierpinski. Think I am the master of the list at the moment.

Regards

Robert

[QUOTE=robert44444uk;277433]
First to 172 primes
[/QUOTE]

Oops see post 28 July 2010!!! try 173 primes

Found a 110 and 109 from E66
 

[CODE]R 37448153735769 66 100/5784 110/10000 K=##### iteration=13 I=57650 Tue Nov 08 21:22:03 2011[/CODE]

E66 also has 25 k's in the results file now.

[QUOTE=SaneMur;277482]

Can you post your records on which k values hold these records for Riesel Primes? Is there a chain of 11 for Riesel data?[/QUOTE]

Heres the table for Riesels:

[CODE]

1 1 4285 R 12
2 2 4285 R 12
3 3 4285 R 12
4 4 35463 R 12
5 5 116621 R 12
6 6 116621 R 12
7 7 1318283 R 12
8 8 9852011 R 12
9 9 1353957 R 18
10 10 213933499 R 36
11 11 3982100443 R 36
12 13 709602395 R 28
13 14 15018213074499 R 52
14 17 39984233659 R 28
15 18 39984233659 R 28
16 19 39984233659 R 28
17 23 3428771 R 28
18 28 1159606077 R 28
19 31 15145054826747 R 52
20 32 15145054826747 R 52
21 38 19093867247793 R 58
22 43 9116465726225 R 58
23 47 12896946016177 R 52
24 53 7142135768985 R 66
25 55 7142135768985 R 66
26 59 1035287318275 R 60
27 63 1035287318275 R 60
28 67 4467870581 R 36
29 72 27838286939021 R 66
30 80 19981335621859 R 52
31 88 2386891678443 R 60
32 92 370441035 R 36
33 94 370441035 R 36
34 98 370441035 R 36
35 101 370441035 R 36
36 120 25551958584589 R 52
37 124 25551958584589 R 52
38 134 25551958584589 R 52
39 141 4623034675697 R 58
40 146 15733378254423 R 58
41 160 19235069 R 28
42 167 2386891678443 R 60
43 180 2386891678443 R 60
44 182 2386891678443 R 60
45 188 2386891678443 R 60
46 204 2386891678443 R 60
47 247 14734727402941 R 52
48 260 7130309659129 R 52
49 270 7130309659129 R 52
50 283 68947905359543 R 60
51 290 68947905359543 R 60
52 317 68947905359543 R 60
53 355 11918703180751 R 60
54 378 195937921823 R 52
55 388 17448051050519 R 60
56 401 11918703180751 R 60
57 403 11918703180751 R 60
58 410 11918703180751 R 60
59 466 195937921823 R 52
60 513 626299348811 R 66
61 546 4967391175523 R 52
62 589 4967391175523 R 52
63 607 20392926558493 R 52
64 660 11918703180751 R 60
65 666 11918703180751 R 60
66 683 11918703180751 R 60
67 738 11918703180751 R 60
68 776 67839830084211 R 60
69 819 42788306462971 R 60
70 831 42788306462971 R 60
71 918 23249195384497 R 60
72 933 19122572047641 R 52
73 963 19122572047641 R 52
74 1009 23249195384497 R 60
75 1066 67839830084211 R 60
76 1119 67839830084211 R 60
77 1164 30921565622401 R 52
78 1210 67839830084211 R 60
79 1280 67839830084211 R 60
80 1491 28121720146621 R 66
81 1531 22988492280293 R 58
82 1594 28121720146621 R 66
83 1597 28121720146621 R 66
84 1726 28121720146621 R 66
85 1847 22988492280293 R 58
86 1871 67839830084211 R 60
87 1892 67839830084211 R 60
88 2070 22988492280293 R 58
89 2193 34366743655013 R 52
90 2279 40210975621077 R 82
91 2370 22988492280293 R 58
92 2517 34366743655013 R 52
93 2640 22988492280293 R 58
94 2724 34366743655013 R 52
95 2906 39672235877965 R 52
96 3078 39672235877965 R 52
97 3324 34366743655013 R 52
98 3447 39672235877965 R 52
99 3503 39672235877965 R 52
100 3556 34366743655013 R 52
101 3943 34366743655013 R 52
102 4463 39672235877965 R 52
103 4481 39672235877965 R 52
104 4559 39672235877965 R 52
105 4976 39672235877965 R 52
106 4985 39672235877965 R 52
107 5232 39672235877965 R 52
108 5409 39672235877965 R 52
109 5840 39672235877965 R 52
110 5953 39672235877965 R 52
111 5996 39672235877965 R 52
112 6159 39672235877965 R 52
113 6213 39672235877965 R 52
114 6218 39672235877965 R 52
115 6872 39672235877965 R 52
116 7388 39672235877965 R 52
117 7523 39672235877965 R 52
118 7600 39672235877965 R 52
119 7799 39672235877965 R 52
120 9283 39672235877965 R 52
121 9793 39672235877965 R 52
122 12865 333810595227339 R 106
123 13208 333810595227339 R 106
124 14027 333810595227339 R 106
125 17542 21013492486553 R 66
126 18270 21013492486553 R 66
127 18954 21013492486553 R 66
128 19034 21013492486553 R 66
129 20795 211199705992169 R 100
130 20852 211199705992169 R 100
131 22844 211199705992169 R 100
132 23235 211199705992169 R 100
133 23248 211199705992169 R 100
134 23358 211199705992169 R 100
135 27644 40210975621077 R 82
136 28785 211199705992169 R 100
137 30128 211199705992169 R 100
138 30480 211199705992169 R 100
139 30929 211199705992169 R 100
140 41930 12252904929299 R 66
141 45117 24214294944371 R 82
142 46948 37592143853 R 66
143 47930 37592143853 R 66
144 49351 12252904929299 R 66
145 53717 211199705992169 R 100
146 64050 677709313826537 R 100
147 68376 37592143853 R 66
148 70169 638621868573 R 66
149 73685 638621868573 R 66
150 77167 638621868573 R 66
151 80961 638621868573 R 66
152 84012 638621868573 R 66
153 100101 638621868573 R 66
154 638621868573 R 60
155 638621868573 R 60
156 638621868573 R 60
157 <150000 638621868573 R 60
158 164463 638621868573 R 60
159 169447 638621868573 R 60
160 195317 638621868573 R 60
161 202473 638621868573 R 60
162 233805 638621868573 R 60


[/CODE]

I posted the smallest values I found for the early n counts. Larger M values take over later.

Other 11/11

11 11 68272315374089 S 52 Sierpinski
11 11 8581408158265 R 52 Riesel