![]() |
24 mini-successes for Riesel base 24:
[QUOTE]5629*24^7306-1 6131*24^7357-1 20414*24^7358-1 12136*24^7391-1 2599*24^7620-1 9066*24^7631-1 18824*24^7640-1 4491*24^7641-1 5379*24^7774-1 23584*24^7846-1 18859*24^7894-1 17614*24^7898-1 13214*24^7900-1 23004*24^8000-1 30626*24^8085-1 7354*24^8250-1 10316*24^8367-1 21151*24^8433-1 4626*24^8594-1 3541*24^8587-1 26516*24^8613-1 5501*24^8639-1 6059*24^8658-1 30914*24^8666-1 are all prime [/QUOTE] That leaves 251 k's to tackle |
1 Attachment(s)
Riesel Base 30 k=25 sieved to p=600G for range n=25K-100K, releasing. Sieve file attached. :smile:
|
Riesel base 6 status
after found prime 40657*6^39087-1:
16 candidates to go. - k=1597 at 155k - k=9577 at 58k - other 14 k at 39.3k |
Reserving Riesel base 28 k=4322, 4436, and 4871 up to n=25K (currently all at n=5K).
|
Only hours after I reserve three Riesel Base 28 k's, and I find a probable prime waiting in my lresults file! :grin:
Here it is: [B]4436*28^6242-1 is prime![/B] (Found probable prime by LLR, proved prime with Proth.exe. I would have used PFGW, but I'm using Linux, and I don't have the PFGW linux program--too lazy to register for Yahoo Groups to download it--and it wouldn't work in Wine (the program that lets you run most Windows programs on Linux), whereas Proth.exe does. So I just used Proth.exe, which was fine anyway for a small number like this.) My second prime so far! :banana: Note: I didn't notice the prime in my lresults file until more than an hour after it was found, so I ended up searching k=4436 up to n=13930. I'm continuing to work on the remaining two reserved k's, both at about n=14.3K. :smile: |
1 Attachment(s)
Riesel base 28 k=4322 and 4871 completed up to n=25K, releasing. Prime found on k=4436 (already reported in the "report primes here" thread); k=4436 ended up being tested to n=13930 because I didn't notice the prime until about an hour after it was found.
lresults for the three k's are attached. :smile: |
Status for Sierp base 9 k=2036
Completed n to 170k. No prime. I will send the results to gd_barnes when n =200k.
|
Thanks for info. Japelprime. That's a lot of testing! :flex:
Meanwhile...Carlos has unreserved Sierp base 12 k=404 that was tested to n=88.5K. I have put a sieved file to n=100K on the Sierp reservations web page if anyone is interested in 'cleaning' it. :smile: Gary |
1 Attachment(s)
[quote=gd_barnes;124472]Thanks for info. Japelprime. That's a lot of testing! :flex:
Meanwhile...Carlos has unreserved Sierp base 12 k=404 that was tested to n=88.5K. I have put a sieved file to n=100K on the Sierp reservations web page if anyone is interested in 'cleaning' it. :smile: Gary[/quote] Oops...it's done up to n=96.970k. |
[quote=em99010pepe;124534]Oops...it's done up to n=96.970k.[/quote]
OK, 82 tests to go. I'll reserve it and take it up to n=100K. Were you running this on a slower machine? A preliminary test at n=97K on my 1.66 Ghz Dell core duo laptop shows ~3.35 ms per pit * 347758 bits = ~1182 secs. testing time vs. your 2200+ secs. So this should take me about 27-28 CPU hours to complete it. Maybe my machine is faster at non-powers-of-2 bases. :grin: Gary |
2319*28^65184-1 is a probable prime. Time: 894.036 sec.
Please credit George Woltman's PRP for this result! Testing with pfgw at the moment. Willem. |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 21:50. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.