![]() |
I added the relations from another 100k chunk of q (total almost 5M raw relations, reduced to 691682 relations and 663113 ideals, 205020 cycles) and it finished without a problem. c103=p49*p54
Thanks. :smile: |
gnfs-lasieve4I12e crashed on c88
gnfs-lasieve4I12e just crashed on a c88:
[code] This is client 1 of 1 Using 2 threads Working with NAME=test... Selected default factorization parameters for 88 digit level. Selected lattice siever: F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/gnfs-lasieve4I12e.exe Creating param file to detect parameter changes... Q0=360001, QSTEP=10000. makeJobFile(): q0=360000, q1=370000. makeJobFile(): Adjusted to q0=360001, q1=370000. Lattice sieving algebraic q-values from q=360001 to 370000. "F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/gnfs-lasieve4I12e.exe" -k -o spairs.out.T1 -v -n0 -a test.j .T1 "F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/gnfs-lasieve4I12e.exe" -k -o spairs.out.T2 -v -n0 -a test.j .T2 "F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/cat.exe" spairs.out.T1 >> spairs.out "F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/cat.exe" spairs.out.T2 >> spairs.out Return value 130560. Updating job file and terminating... "F:/Wissenschaft/Mathe/GGNFS/BIN/cat.exe" spairs.out >> spairs.add makeJobFile(): q0=360000, q1=370000. makeJobFile(): Adjusted to q0=360001, q1=370000. ***crash*** [/code] edit: after the crash, I got a windows error message that there has been a problem with gnfs-lasieve4I12e and the job has to be terminated. Polynomial is: [code]n: 2442895043335315532241384991110259348565485108389595693855451132244907689766065727669961 m: Y0: -923404484710773674886 Y1: 190201825129 c0: -6095776657859982538195471 c1: -14427067949801133934 c2: 13273075276639 c3: -89656634 c4: 3360 skew: 269617.07 rlim: 600000 alim: 360000 lpbr: 25 lpba: 25 mfbr: 43 mfba: 43 rlambda: 2.2 alambda: 2.2 q0: 360001 qintsize: 4999 #q1:365000 [/code] (resp. with q0=365000 for the second part of the job, at least one of these just crashed.) BTW: It is NOT a disk full issue, as I have 4 GB free disk space. |
No crash with the linux binary. Jeff may help esting the windows binary crash.
I suggest repeating (just to see if it crashes again), and then skipping the subrange (you only need to edit test.job.T1, set q0 to 370001, and start factMsieve.pl again; when factors are found, restart aliqueit -f ...) and forgetting about it. |
[QUOTE=Batalov;191270]No crash with the linux binary. Jeff may help esting the windows binary crash.
I suggest repeating (just to see if it crashes again), and then skipping the subrange (you only need to edit test.job.T1, set q0 to 370001, and start factMsieve.pl again; when factors are found, restart aliqueit -f ...) and forgetting about it.[/QUOTE] For me it crashed again after repeating (windowd binary on a P4). These kind of crashes seem to happen quite frequently (with the windows binaries) for composites <c90, so I prefer to set the crossover point in aliqueit.ini (I am doing automated factorizations using aliqueit.exe.) to c90 rather than c85 when I am NOT around to recover the run from crashes. [SIZE="1"](if you want to have more testing cases: go to the [URL="http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?p=191273#post191273"]subproject thread[/URL] over there in the aliqueit forum, reserve a sequence or two and let them run for a day with the crossover point between MPQS and GNFS set to c85 in the aliqueit.ini.)[/SIZE] |
Another test case which seems to crash reproducibly (at least when I try to factor it with factmsieve.pl) which a windows exception message concerning gnfs-lasieve4I12e
[code]n: 326038543709470087296096782349895406069109369957419965789980768092711144124260014949595783289 m: Y0: -19198498542350696153230 Y1: 1231688614399 c0: -3374692143493600413536451 c1: 290889882624121690652 c2: -214715152886731 c3: -978296298 c4: 2400 skew: 446522.96 rlim: 1200000 alim: 350000 lpbr: 25 lpba: 25 mfbr: 45 mfba: 45 rlambda: 2.4 alambda: 2.4 q0: 350000 qintsize: 49999 [/code] |
[QUOTE=Andi47;191309]Another test case which seems to crash reproducibly (at least when I try to factor it with factmsieve.pl) which a windows exception message concerning gnfs-lasieve4I12e[/QUOTE]
How long did it take to crash? I'm testing this out now on a Win32 P4 system to see if it does for me. Jeff. |
[QUOTE=Jeff Gilchrist;191457]How long did it take to crash? I'm testing this out now on a Win32 P4 system to see if it does for me.
Jeff.[/QUOTE] I attempted to factor this number by factmsieve.pl (started from aliqueit.exe after ecm had found no factors); if I have seen correctly, it crashed almost immediatly after starting the range of q=350k - 390(?)k. When I tried to restart again, it crashed again almost immediately. |
Just try increasing q0 to 360K or so
|
[QUOTE=smh;191461]Just try increasing q0 to 360K or so[/QUOTE]
...or factoring with MPQS (msieve or yafu); both works. the problem is not that a factorization would become "inpossible", the problem is that if it crashes, and I am not around for quite some time (i.e. some days), the CPU would be idle. (and when I come back to that PC and expect a finished task I find out that it got stuck at the beginning - just an hour before I had left for weekend.) |
[QUOTE=Andi47;191460]I attempted to factor this number by factmsieve.pl (started from aliqueit.exe after ecm had found no factors); if I have seen correctly, it crashed almost immediatly after starting the range of q=350k - 390(?)k.
When I tried to restart again, it crashed again almost immediately.[/QUOTE] Not sure what is going on with your system, mine just completed fine with this: [CODE]prp34 factor: 1499584989766220246253035078939017 prp60 factor: 217419183263696371366953971030857366769285808426067018460017[/CODE] No crash at all. Are you sure your system is stable? I will try your previous example and see what happens there. <- Ok your first example is crashing for me, not sure why yet. |
Are you sure that everything is OK with your executable?
I have tried your number with my self compiled siever version and everything worked without any problems. I used factmsieve.pl from within cygwin and used a windows 32Bit version of the siever compiled with VS2008 and MPIR instead of GMP. (P4 assembly routines). |
| All times are UTC. The time now is 22:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.