[quote=Anonymous;133685]Are you by any chance using a Debian, Redhat or Slackware based system? [/quote]
of course I'm using debian! what a question! ;-)
[quote=Anonymous;133685]If so, then you've run into a known bug in LLRnet DNS resolution on those Linux distros. Either a recompile, or using a copy of LLRnet compiled on one of those distros, will fix the problem.[/quote]
May I hope that a recompile should yield the most efficient result./configure;make
[quote=Anonymous;133685]If you'd like a precompiled version that should fix the problem, you can get one [URL="http://bugmesticky.googlepages.com/llrnet.linux.sr5.tgz"]here[/URL], which I compiled on a Ubuntu (i.e. Debian-based) system. It doesn't have the GUI, but if you'd really like to have that send me a PM and I can show you how to do a workaround. (The GUI is useful for monitoring the progress of the individual numbers, which is especially nice for BIG numbers like PSP's.)[/quote]
thanks for the quick answer and offered help. I'll have it a try to recompile it myself...
PS:
erm...:blush: the "./configue;make" approach didn't work out of the box... I see some .c and .h files, but is this the ../llrsource or not? as to the WTF.. I mean FLTK, I apt-getted lib...-dev which came with 10M of more basic stuff, I hope that'll do...
PPS: :cry: visibly the .c, .cxx etc are not complete sources - it complains about missing lprime.h and among others, Llr.c - will this ever be found? (suspecting llr.c instead - but only llr2.c is present...)
P³S: I think using your ...sr5 I have automagically joined the club :)
but I'll PM you for the GUI...

[quote=m_f_h;133707]of course I'm using debian! what a question! ;-)[/quote]
Ah yes, I totally agree with you there--Ubuntu is my favorite (and, as a consequence of it being closely based on Debian, Debian is a close second). I personally use Ubuntu since it keeps all the good things about Debian, while having a more consistent/frequent release cycle, and only having one CD to download rather than 20. :wink: Though, I must say, both Debian and Ubuntu are quite similar, and I'd feel quite at home on a system with either. :smile:

[quote]May I hope that a recompile should yield the most efficient result./configure;make

thanks for the quick answer and offered help. I'll have it a try to recompile it myself...
PS:
erm...:blush: the "./configue;make" approach didn't work out of the box... I see some .c and .h files, but is this the ../llrsource or not? as to the WTF.. I mean FLTK, I apt-getted lib...-dev which came with 10M of more basic stuff, I hope that'll do...
PPS: :cry: visibly the .c, .cxx etc are not complete sources - it complains about missing lprime.h and among others, Llr.c - will this ever be found? (suspecting llr.c instead - but only llr2.c is present...)
P³S: I think using your ...sr5 I have automagically joined the club :)
but I'll PM you for the GUI...[/quote]
Hmm...I don't think you're supposed to run configure/make from the llrsource directory, but from the llrnet directory instead. (It may be called something slightly different, I don't remember exactly.) Regardless, the file called "INSTALL" in the llrnet directory should have directions as to where to run configure/make from.

As long as the precompiled version is working for you, though, then I guess that should do the trick. :smile:

[quote=Anonymous;133726]I personally use Ubuntu since it keeps all the good things about Debian, while having a more consistent/frequent release cycle, and only having one CD to download rather than 20. :wink: [/quote]
I use netinstall - that's less than half a CD to burn ;-)
[but it seems that fetching packets and unpacking / configuing them is not yet parallelized to a maximal extend - that could speed up network installation quite a bit, I suppose (on multi core machines)]

as to compiling LLRnet from source, I got some "Oelf32.i386" related errors which might(?) be responsible for the fact I don't get a GUI.
Even installing lots of "Fox" stuff and trying USE_FOX=1, it didn't work out, either.
(as to the rest, automagic registration / logging in, k/n reservation and crunching works almost too straightforwardly ... (mprime at least asks some preliminary confirmation questions... ;-))

[QUOTE=ltd;130559]Primegrid did reach another milestone today.

With sieving under BOINC we did complete an amount of work that
is equal to a range of 1500T.
:party::beer::beer:[/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 3004T!

[QUOTE=Joe O;137473]PrimeGrid has now sieved 3004T![/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 4090T!

[QUOTE=Joe O;139179]PrimeGrid has now sieved 4090T![/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 4750T!

[QUOTE=Joe O;143738]PrimeGrid has now sieved 4750T![/QUOTE]

Prime Grid has now sieved 5074T!

@Joe:
Apologice for not sending you the factor information the last two months.
I will do it again next weekend. (I am out of town again.)

[QUOTE=Joe O;145181]Prime Grid has now sieved 5074T![/QUOTE]

[QUOTE=ltd;145183]@Joe:
Apologice for not sending you the factor information the last two months.
I will do it again next weekend. (I am out of town again.)[/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 5375T!

@LTD: I got the files, thanks. There were no suprises.

[QUOTE=Joe O;146399]PrimeGrid has now sieved 5375T![/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 6023T!

[QUOTE=Joe O;149447]PrimeGrid has now sieved 6023T![/QUOTE]

PrimeGrid has now sieved 10066T!