Status:
13 at 2.98M
45 at 1.9M
93 at 1.48M
109 at 1.62M
131 at 1.51M
167 at 1.41M
197 at 1.44M
201 at 1.45M
229 at 1.4M
231 at 1.4M
245 at 1.4M
405 at 1.36M
127 and 443 unchanged at 3.7M and 2.0M respectively. 99 also unchanged at 2M.
Thanks to Clocker, who tested 93 and 109 from 1.56 to 1.59M for me.
-Curtis

k=63 tested to n=4M. No recent primes.

k=49 tested to n=3.27M

k=41 tested to n=3M, prime for n=2872058. Releasing this k.

status report
 

k=25 tested till n=3.02M
k=43 tested till n=3.44M
k=79 tested till n=2.4M
k=101 tested till n=3.58M
k=151 tested till n=3.39M

[B]Status report[/B]

k=7 at 3650k (including 3499-3599 already tested by Peter)
k=21 at 2450k
k=35 at 2390k
k=37 at 2350k
k=55 at 1830k
k=77 at 1940k
k=181 at 1760k
k=199 at 1500k
k=225 at 1625k
k=239 at 2M
k=293 at 1620k
k=297 at 1610k

Hi Curtis,

Regarding your recent report below, your last update of k=127 was at n=3110k not 3.7M. Of course if you already tested 3110-3700 then no problems.

And regarding k=93 in the 1.56-1.59M range, you have a gap between 1.48M and 1.56M, is that right?

Thanks!

[QUOTE]127 and 443 unchanged at 3.7M and 2.0M respectively. 99 also unchanged at 2M.
Thanks to Clocker, who tested 93 and 109 from 1.56 to 1.59M for me.[/QUOTE]

The [URL="http://www.15k.org/riesellist.html"]k<300 status page[/URL] updated with latest status reports and reported primes.

If you find any discrepancies please let me know.

[QUOTE=Kosmaj;345945]Hi Curtis,

Regarding your recent report below, your last update of k=127 was at n=3110k not 3.7M. Of course if you already tested 3110-3700 then no problems.

And regarding k=93 in the 1.56-1.59M range, you have a gap between 1.48M and 1.56M, is that right?

Thanks![/QUOTE]

127 was complete to 3.7M about a year ago. I didn't bother looking for an old update. The office machines I had 127 on were replaced last August, and I can't install LLR on the new ones, so I haven't made much progress since then.

93 is testing 1.48-1.56 on two cores presently. Clocker was looking for a prime of a specific size. so I offered him a few of my k's in that region. He ran just the two I specified.

Hi Curtis,

Thanks for taking time to confirm your limits.
Everything is all right now.

[URL="http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=114844"]33*2^2499883-1[/URL] (752542 digits)
k=33 tested to n=2.5M