k=95 tested to n=2.0M

99 is complete to 2M. I will continue with this k.

I just got a new i7, and wish to test a new number on it- so I'm reserving 119 from 1.3M. I will likely test it until I find a prime, or 2M.
-Curtis

[QUOTE=VBCurtis;285036]

I just got a new i7, and wish to test a new number on it- so I'm reserving 119 from 1.3M. I will likely test it until I find a prime, or 2M.
-Curtis[/QUOTE]

If your new i7 is a laptop please forget what I will write, if not it was the wrong decision for LLR, the i5 2500K is more energy efficient than a i7 2600K.

People do buy computers for reasons other than LLR efficiency.

Taking the following k's to 1.3M. k=215, 229, 231, 237, 241, 249, 261, 265, 267, 271, 273, 277, 279, 285, 291, 293

Status report
 

k=49 at n=2.21M
k=67 at n=2.40M
k=81 at n=1.61M

status report
 

k=25 tested till n=2.75M
k=43 tested till n=2.80M
k=79 tested till n=1.99M
k=101 tested till n=2.99M
k=151 tested till n=2.83M
k=223 tested till n=3.16M

Status report
 

k=25 tested till n=2.77M
k=43 tested till n=2.82M
k=79 tested till n=2.04M
k=101 tested till n=3.01M
k=151 tested till n=2.85M
k=223 tested till n=3.18M

Status report
 

k=49 at n=2.23M
k=81 at n=1.67M

Status Report
 

k=7 at 3060k
k=21 at 1910k
k=35 at 2M, including the range tested by Peter
k=139 at 1200k

The [URL="http://www.15k.org/riesellist.html"]k<300 status page[/URL] is now updated up to here.

I started to test the range k=51, n = 2.5M to 3.3M at 19 Oct 2010.

Nearly 80% finished, no primes.

I plan to continue beyond n=3.3M if there is no prime in this range and will hopefully find a large RPS prime.

My computer is a suboptimal solution for the sieving, would anyone consider to support me for the range n = 3.300.000 to 5.000.000?