Now Testing M20,000,000+
 

GIMPS has broken into the M20,000,000 Lucas-Lehmer testing range :D ! I don't know if this is a good thing or a bad thing :? , but it is a definite sign of progress :( . Sure we will have to start using 1280K FFT sizes :shock: , but you will NEVER notice :D . I'm looking forward to testing my first 20million exponent :D , are you?

You forgot to include an option of M33,000,000 + ;)

heretic

:shock: .How did I miss that :shock: ? Sorry to all 33million+ testers :) (Just vote D.C. and Factoring pretending nothing happened wrong ;) ) :shock: .

I think you can still edit it...

I already tested one 21M exponent, changed the worktodo from factoring to first time ...

The progress of the project is impressive. I started about two years ago, when the typical first time test was 13M. We can thank Northwood for that ...

[quote="Xyzzy"]I think you can still edit it...[/quote]

I don’t think I can edit the poll as a member :? , but I know it can be done as an Administrator (from experience with other forums :D ).

Your wish is my command! :D

Re: Now Testing M20,000,000+
 

[quote="E_tron"]GIMPS has broken into the M20,000,000 Lucas-Lehmer testing range :D ! I don't know if this is a good thing or a bad thing :? , but it is a definite sign of progress :( . Sure we will have to start using 1280K FFT sizes :shock: , but you will NEVER notice :D . I'm looking forward to testing my first 20million exponent :D , are you?[/quote]

Small stuff, try testing an exponent in the 79m range. Trial factoring alone took 9 months.....

Re: Now Testing M20,000,000+
 

That must have been a pretty slow box ... I did five TF runs on a 1333 tbird, taking about a month each. Found a 69 bit factor, what a relief that was - saved about two years of LL work. Still have to start the actual test, waiting on that GB of ram for P-1. There are a few on the team, one has something like 60 million iterations already.

[quote="nitro"]
Small stuff, try testing an exponent in the 79m range. Trial factoring alone took 9 months.....[/quote]

With it taking so long to do primes under 10M would it not be more sensible to work these ones out now and wait for technology to catch up a little. When all the primes are tested upto 20M the computers will be able to formulate them so much faster.

The reward for finding a 20M prime digit is less than the chance of winning THE LOTTERY for the moment

Yeah, but the lottery has no scientific value.

Sadly, while I've been doing 33,000,000+ exponents almost from when I started with GIMPS, I've not been doing them for years.

Yet.

Unless you're counting P90 CPU years, that is.

8-)

I'm glad to hear this. But the new exponent assigned to me is only 15M ;) ;) ;)

[quote="hyh1048576"]I'm glad to hear this. But the new exponent assigned to me is only 15M ;) ;) ;)[/quote]

One of my machines picked up a M14 right before i posted this tread :( , but i noticed a M20 in my work status :D .

Looks like this poll lost a fight with a blender.

[quote=Uncwilly;137012]Looks like this poll lost a fight with a blender.[/quote]
In fact, a lot of the older polls (mostly in the Lounge) seem to have all been munged together like this. Xyzzy, what's up?

P.S.: In case it helps, these things have been like this for a while. That is, long enough that I haven't ever seen them otherwise.