mersenneforum.org

mersenneforum.org (https://www.mersenneforum.org/index.php)
-   Puzzles (https://www.mersenneforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=18)
-   -   Triangle puzzle (https://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=7274)

Zeta-Flux 2007-03-06 20:15

Triangle puzzle
 
You are given an equilateral triangle. There is some fixed point in the interior, and straight lines of length a, b, and c are drawn from the corners of the triangle to this point. Find the area of the triangle in terms of a,b,c. (Alternatively, find the length of one of the sides.)

philmoore 2007-03-07 12:30

[spoiler]The area will be given by
[tex]\frac{(a^2+b^2+c^2)\sqrt{3}+3\sqrt{2(a^2b^2+a^2c^2+b^2c^2)-(a^4+b^4+c^4)}}{8}[/tex].
Since this equals [tex]\frac{s^2\sqrt{3}}{4}[/tex], we can easily solve for [tex]s[/tex].[/spoiler]

philmoore 2007-03-07 12:39

Once again, I am finding the simultaneous use of spoiler tags with tex markup creating problems. Suggestions, anyone?

[spoiler]The area is ((a[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]+c[sup]2[/sup])sqrt(3)+3*sqrt(2(a[sup]2[/sup]b[sup]2[/sup]+a[sup]2[/sup]c[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]c[sup]2[/sup])-(a[sup]4[/sup]+b[sup]4[/sup]+c[sup]4[/sup])))/8[/spoiler]

Zeta-Flux 2007-03-07 15:29

Philmore,

Go ahead and solve for s. It should be a relatively simple looking formula.

davieddy 2007-03-07 16:27

[quote=philmoore;100130]Once again, I am finding the simultaneous use of spoiler tags with tex markup creating problems. Suggestions, anyone?
[/quote]

No, but I couldn't manage to uncover it!

philmoore 2007-03-07 18:06

[QUOTE=davieddy;100149]No, but I couldn't manage to uncover it![/QUOTE]

To see what should be there, go back to my post #2 above, hit QUOTE, then in the Reply to Thread page, remove the spoiler tags, add a minimum of one character of your own, and then hit the "Preview Post" button. (But please don't "Submit Reply".)

philmoore 2007-03-07 19:50

[QUOTE=Zeta-Flux;100143]Go ahead and solve for s. It should be a relatively simple looking formula.[/QUOTE]

I'm not quite sure how simple is relatively simple. How about:

[spoiler]s[sup]2[/sup] = (a[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]+c[sup]2[/sup]+sqrt(3(a+b+c)(a+b-c)(a-b+c)(-a+b+c)))/2
or:
s[sup]2[/sup] = (a[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]+c[sup]2[/sup]+sqrt(6(a[sup]2[/sup]b[sup]2[/sup]+a[sup]2[/sup]c[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]c[sup]2[/sup])-3(a[sup]4[/sup]+b[sup]4[/sup]+c[sup]4[/sup])))/2
or:
s[sup]2[/sup] = (a[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]+c[sup]2[/sup]+sqrt(3(a[sup]2[/sup]+b[sup]2[/sup]+c[sup]2[/sup])[sup]2[/sup]-6(a[sup]4[/sup]+b[sup]4[/sup]+c[sup]4[/sup])))/2
I like the first, reminiscent of Heron's formula, but I don't see how, if I take the square root to solve for s, I get any significant simplification in any of the three versions.
[/spoiler]

Zeta-Flux 2007-03-08 02:29

Hmmm... maybe I was thinking of the special case when b=c. I'll have to go ask the person who presented this puzzle to me.

Zeta-Flux 2007-03-08 13:37

Now I remember what I was missing. One is supposed to assume that (a,b,c) is a pythagorean triple (like 3,4,5). That way, you don't need to use Bramagupta's formula. There is a slick geometric solution.

Cheers, and sorry for the harded puzzle,
Zeta-Flux

philmoore 2007-03-08 23:30

I really am curious about the slick geometric solution, as a[sup]2[/sup] + b[sup]2[/sup] = c[sup]2[/sup] now leads to the algebraic solution:

[spoiler]s[sup]2[/sup] = a[sup]2[/sup] + b[sup]2[/sup] + a*b*sqrt(3)
or: s[sup]2[/sup] = a[sup]2[/sup] + b[sup]2[/sup] - 2*a*b*cos(150[sup]0[/sup])

By the way, my solution was strictly analytic, but I am hoping that this hint given by the law of cosines will help in finding a more geometric solution.
[/spoiler]

Nice problem, at any rate, both the original stated version and this new variation.

Zeta-Flux 2007-03-08 23:50

Here is a hint:

[COLOR="White"]Try forming a right triangle.[/COLOR]


All times are UTC. The time now is 14:08.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.